Quadro M2000 vs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 with Quadro M2000, including specs and performance data.
M2000 outperforms Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 by a small 5% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 498 | 480 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 3.91 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 9.61 |
| Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | GM206 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 15 August 2020 (4 years ago) | 8 April 2016 (9 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $437.75 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 768 |
| Core clock speed | no data | 796 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 1163 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 2,940 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 75 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 55.82 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 1.786 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 32 |
| TMUs | no data | 48 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 201 mm |
| Width | no data | 1" (2.5 cm) |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR4 | 128 Bit |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 4 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 1653 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | Up to 106 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | no data |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | 4x DisplayPort |
| Number of simultaneous displays | no data | 4 |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
| 3D Vision Pro | no data | + |
| Mosaic | no data | + |
| nView Desktop Management | no data | + |
| Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | no data | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | - | 5.2 |
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+2.5%
|
40−45
−2.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+1.8%
|
55−60
−1.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+2.5%
|
40−45
−2.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+10%
|
30−33
−10%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
Full HD
High Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+2.5%
|
40−45
−2.5%
|
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
+0.7%
|
140−150
−0.7%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−4.5%
|
70−75
+4.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Fortnite | 55−60
+1.8%
|
55−60
−1.8%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+2.5%
|
40−45
−2.5%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
| Metro Exodus | 18−20
+0%
|
18−20
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+10%
|
30−33
−10%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
| Valorant | 90−95
+0%
|
90−95
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 40−45
+2.5%
|
40−45
−2.5%
|
| Dota 2 | 65−70
−4.5%
|
70−75
+4.5%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 30−33
+0%
|
30−33
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
+2.5%
|
40−45
−2.5%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 30−35
+10%
|
30−33
−10%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
Full HD
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 55−60
+1.8%
|
55−60
−1.8%
|
1440p
High Preset
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
+1.4%
|
70−75
−1.4%
|
| Grand Theft Auto V | 12−14
+8.3%
|
12−14
−8.3%
|
| Metro Exodus | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Valorant | 100−110
+4%
|
100−105
−4%
|
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 21−24
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 18−20
+5.6%
|
18−20
−5.6%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
+4.8%
|
21−24
−4.8%
|
1440p
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 20−22
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
4K
High Preset
| Grand Theft Auto V | 20−22
−5%
|
21−24
+5%
|
| Metro Exodus | 5−6
+0%
|
5−6
+0%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
| Valorant | 45−50
−2%
|
50−55
+2%
|
4K
Ultra Preset
| Battlefield 5 | 10−12
+10%
|
10−11
−10%
|
| Dota 2 | 30−35
−2.9%
|
35−40
+2.9%
|
| Far Cry 5 | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
+0%
|
16−18
+0%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
4K
Epic Preset
| Fortnite | 9−10
+0%
|
9−10
+0%
|
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.15 | 9.61 |
| Recency | 15 August 2020 | 8 April 2016 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 28 nm |
Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
Quadro M2000, on the other hand, has a 5% higher aggregate performance score.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 and Quadro M2000.
Be aware that Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook graphics card while Quadro M2000 is a workstation one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
