Iris Xe Graphics G7 vs Quadro M6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000 24 GB
VS
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7 80EUs Iris Xe Graphics G7 96EUs Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G4 Tiger Lake-U Xe Graphics G7 UHD Graphics Xe 16EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H) UHD Graphics Xe 750 32EUs UHD Graphics Xe G1 UHD Graphics Xe G4 48EUs

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 with Iris Xe Graphics G7, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M6000
2015
12 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
26.35
+198%

M6000 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by a whopping 198% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking199455
Place by popularitynot in top-10018
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.45no data
Power efficiency8.37no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameGM200Tiger Lake Xe
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date21 March 2015 (9 years ago)15 August 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores307296
Core clock speed988 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1114 MHzno data
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Wattno data
Texture fill rate213.9no data
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs192no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR4
Maximum RAM amount12 GBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1653 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)DirectX 12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA5.2-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Valorant 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Far Cry 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Metro Exodus 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%

4K
High Preset

Grand Theft Auto V 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Metro Exodus 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Valorant 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 42 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 26.35 8.83
Recency 21 March 2015 15 August 2020
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

Quadro M6000 has a 198.4% higher aggregate performance score.

Iris Xe Graphics G7, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro M6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Iris Xe Graphics G7 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 is a workstation card while Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
Iris Xe Graphics G7 Iris Xe Graphics G7
vs
Graphics 4-Cores iGPU (Arc) Graphics 4 Cores iGPU (Arc)
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
vs
M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
M6000 24 GB NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
vs
RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4070 SUPER
Tesla M6 NVIDIA Tesla M6
vs
Quadro P2200 Quadro P2200
Tesla M60 NVIDIA Tesla M60
vs
GTX 680 GTX 680
Tesla M60 NVIDIA Tesla M60
vs
Pro V340 Pro V340
Quadro M4000 NVIDIA Quadro M4000
vs
ATI HD 3850 HD 3850
Quadro K1200 NVIDIA Quadro K1200
vs
RTX 3060 Ti GA103 RTX 3060 Ti GA103
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
Radeon E6760 Radeon E6760
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
Pro 580 Pro 580
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
Xbox One X GPU One X GPU
Quadro K2200 NVIDIA Quadro K2200
vs
RX 550 512SP RX 550 512SP

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.4 152 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 2710 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 or Iris Xe Graphics G7, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.