NVIDIA Quadro K5200: specs and benchmarks

NVIDIA started Quadro K5200 sales 22 July 2014 at a recommended price of $1,699.74. This is Kepler architecture desktop card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 8 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 6.01 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 192.3 GB / s.

Compatibility-wise, this is Dual-slot card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Its manufacturer default version has a length of 267 mm. 1x 6-pin power connector is required, and power consumption is at 150 Watt.

It provides good gaming and benchmark performance at 27.69 percent of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti.

Of Quadro K5200's architecture, market type and release date.

Quadro K5200's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K5200's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Information on Quadro K5200's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K5200: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K5200.

APIs supported by Quadro K5200, sometimes including their particular versions.

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Quadro K5200. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K5200. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Let's see how good Quadro K5200 is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Comparisons with system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect real performance inaccurately.