AMD Ryzen 5 1400: specs and benchmarks

VS

Summary

AMD started Ryzen 5 1400 sales 11 April 2017 at a recommended price of $169. This is a Zen architecture desktop processor primarily aimed at office systems. It has 4 cores and 8 threads, and is based on 14 nm manufacturing technology, with a max turbo frequency of 3400 MHz and an unlocked multiplier.

Compatibility-wise, this is AMD Socket AM4 processor with a TDP of 65 Watt. It supports DDR4 memory.

It provides poor benchmark performance at 6.17% of a leader's which is AMD EPYC 9654.

EPYC 9654EPYC9654
Compare

General info

Ryzen 5 1400 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and pricing.

Place in performance ranking1021
Value for money14.26
Market segmentDesktop processor
SeriesAMD Ryzen 5
Architecture codenameZen (2017−2020)
Release date11 April 2017 (6 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$169of 305 (Core i7-870)
Current price$82 (0.5x MSRP)of 15710 (Xeon Platinum 8276L)
Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

Technical specs

Basic microprocessor parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters can generally indicate CPU performance, but to be more precise you have to review its test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)
Threads8
Base clock speed3.2 GHzof 4.7 (Ryzen 9 7900X)
Boost clock speed3.4 GHzof 6 (Core i9-13900KS)
L1 cache96K (per core)of 7475.2 (Apple M2 Pro 10-Core)
L2 cache512K (per core)of 36864 (Apple M2 Max)
L3 cache8 MB (shared)of 768 (EPYC 7773X)
Chip lithography14 nmof 4 (Ryzen 9 7940H)
Die size192 mm2
Number of transistors4,800 millionof 9900000 (Ryzen 5 7645HX)
64 bit support+
Windows 11 compatibility-
Unlocked multiplier+

Compatibility

Information on Ryzen 5 1400 compatibility with other computer components and devices: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)of 8 (Xeon Platinum 8160M)
SocketAM4
Power consumption (TDP)65 Wattof 400 (Xeon Platinum 9282)

Technologies and extensions

Technological capabilities and additional instructions supported by Ryzen 5 1400. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsXFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT
AES-NI+
AVX+

Virtualization technologies

Supported virtual machine optimization technologies. Some are specific to Intel only, some to AMD.

AMD-V+

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel number of RAM supported by Ryzen 5 1400's memory controller. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequency may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4of 5600 (Ryzen 9 7940H)
Maximum memory size64 GBof 786 (Xeon E5-2670 v3)
Max memory channels2of 12 (Xeon Platinum 9221)
Maximum memory bandwidth42.671 GB/sof 460.8 (EPYC 9654)
ECC memory support+

Graphics specifications

General parameters of a GPU integrated into Ryzen 5 1400.

Integrated graphics card-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection types of supported peripherals.

PCIe version3.0of 5 (EPYC 9654)
PCI Express lanes20of 128 (EPYC 7401)

Benchmark performance

Single-core and multi-core benchmark results of Ryzen 5 1400. Overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Ryzen 5 1400 6.17

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Ryzen 5 1400 7778

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Ryzen 5 1400 948

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 41%

Ryzen 5 1400 3094

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 1400 4205

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Ryzen 5 1400 17557

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Ryzen 5 1400 6437

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Ryzen 5 1400 8

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Ryzen 5 1400 688

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 1400 134

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Ryzen 5 1400 1.53

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1400 4.1

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1400 2758

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1400 147

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Ryzen 5 1400 43

Geekbench 2

Benchmark coverage: 5%

Ryzen 5 1400 10513

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit multi-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Ryzen 5 1400 11712

Geekbench 4.0 64-bit single-core

Benchmark coverage: 3%

Ryzen 5 1400 3651

Gaming performance

Relative perfomance

Overall Ryzen 5 1400 performance compared to nearest competitors among desktop CPUs.


Intel equivalent

According to our data, the closest Intel alternative to Ryzen 5 1400 is Core i7-5775R, which is nearly equal in speed and lower by 3 positions in our ranking.

i7-5775RCore i75775R
Compare

Here are some closest Intel rivals to Ryzen 5 1400:

Similar processors

Here is our recommendation of several processors that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

i7-5775RCore i75775R
Compare
i5-8500TCore i58500T
Compare
i3-9350KCore i39350K
Compare
i7-5950HQCore i75950HQ
Compare
i7-5775CCore i75775C
Compare
i7-7700TCore i77700T
Compare

Recommended GPUs

People consider these graphics cards to be good for Ryzen 5 1400, according to our PC configuration statistics.

These are the fastest graphics cards for Ryzen 5 1400 in our user configuration statistics. There is a total of 5835 configurations based on Ryzen 5 1400 in our database.

RTX 4090 GeForce RTX 4090
0.3% (20/5835)
RTX 4080 GeForce RTX 4080
0.03% (2/5835)
RTX 4070 Ti GeForce RTX 4070 Ti
0.02% (1/5835)
RTX 3090 Ti GeForce RTX 3090 Ti
0.1% (8/5835)
RTX 3080 Ti GeForce RTX 3080 Ti
0.2% (12/5835)
RX 6900 XT Radeon RX 6900 XT
0.03% (2/5835)
RTX 3090 GeForce RTX 3090
0.2% (9/5835)
RTX 3080 GeForce RTX 3080
0.05% (3/5835)
RX 6800 XT Radeon RX 6800 XT
0.02% (1/5835)
RTX 3070 Ti GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
0.05% (3/5835)

User ratings: view and submit

Here is the rating given to the reviewed processor by our users. Let others know your opinion by rating it yourself.


4.1 501 vote

Rate AMD Ryzen 5 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Ryzen 5 1400, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.