Quadro K5200 vs GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB

Aggregated performance score

GTX 1060 3 GB
2016
3 GB GDDR5
24.77
+59%

GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms Quadro K5200 by 59% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking203318
Place by popularity24not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.365.95
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGP106GK110B
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 August 2016 (7 years ago)22 July 2014 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $1,699.74
Current price$1112 (5.6x MSRP)$451 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K5200 has 152% better value for money than GTX 1060 3 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores11522304
Core clock speed1506 MHz667 MHz
Boost clock speed1708 MHz771 MHz
Number of transistors4,400 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate123.0148.0
Floating-point performance3,935 gflops3,553 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length250 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB8 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed8008 MHz6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.2 GB/s192.3 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan++
CUDA6.13.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1060 3 GB 24.77
+59%
Quadro K5200 15.58

GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms Quadro K5200 by 59% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1060 3 GB 9588
+59%
Quadro K5200 6029

GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms Quadro K5200 by 59% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 24.77 15.58
Recency 18 August 2016 22 July 2014
Cost $199 $1699.74
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 150 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is a desktop card while Quadro K5200 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 7607 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 40 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.