RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile vs Quadro K5200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000 K40d K40m K40s K40st K40t
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
1000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Embedded 2000 Blackwell Mobile 3000 Blackwell Mobile 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Mobile 5000 Blackwell Embedded 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5200 with RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K5200
2014, $1,700
8 GB GDDR5, 150 Watt
14.69

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile outperforms K5200 by a whopping 180% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking389107
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.95no data
Power efficiency7.5233.18
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGK110BGB203
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date22 July 2014 (11 years ago)19 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,699.74 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores230410496
Core clock speed667 MHz990 MHz
Boost clock speed771 MHz1680 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate148.0551.0
Floating-point processing power3.553 TFLOPS35.27 TFLOPS
ROPs48112
TMUs192328
Tensor Coresno data328
Ray Tracing Coresno data82
L1 Cacheno data10.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.3 GB/s896.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.4
CUDA3.512.0
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD50−55
−186%
143
+186%
1440p40−45
−203%
121
+203%
4K30−35
−190%
87
+190%

Cost per frame, $

1080p33.99no data
1440p42.49no data
4K56.66no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 160
+0%
160
+0%
Metro Exodus 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 138
+0%
138
+0%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Valorant 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 170
+0%
170
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

This is how Quadro K5200 and RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 186% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 203% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is 190% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 58 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 14.69 41.06
Recency 22 July 2014 19 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 95 Watt

RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile has a 179.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 460% more advanced lithography process, and 57.9% lower power consumption.

The RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5200 is a workstation graphics card while RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K5200
Quadro K5200
NVIDIA RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
FirePro W9000 FirePro W9000
RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile
vs
RTX A5500 Mobile RTX A5500 Mobile
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
GTX 570 570
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
FX 560 560
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
Tesla V100 SXM2 V100 SXM2
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX 5060 Ti 5060 Ti
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Mobile 2000 Blackwell Mobile
Quadro K5200 Quadro K5200
vs
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell Embedded 4000 Blackwell Embedded
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
GT 645M 645M
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
HD Graphics 500 500
Quadro K620 Quadro K620
vs
7950 GX2 7950 GX2
GRID K120Q GRID K120Q
vs
ATI X550 HyperMemory X550 HyperMemory

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 51 votes

Rate Quadro K5200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5200 or RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.