K1000M vs RTX 6000

Buy
VS
Buy
Price now 232$
Games supported 59%
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
Buy
  • Interface MXM-A (3.0)
  • Core clock speed 850
  • Max video memory 2048 MB
  • Memory type DDR3
  • Memory clock speed 1800
  • Maximum resolution
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 1440 MHz
  • Max video memory 24 GB
  • Memory type GDDR6
  • Memory clock speed 14000 MHz
  • Maximum resolution
Price now 6623$
Games supported 100%
Graphics card Graphics card NVIDIA Quadro K1000M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in performance rating72916
Value for money0.254.90
ArchitectureKeplerTuring
GPU code nameN14P-Q1TU102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 June 2012 (9 years ago)13 August 2018 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.90 $6,299
Price now$232 (1.9x MSRP)$6623 (1.1x MSRP)
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100
  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1924608
Core clock speed850 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)45 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60509.8
Floating-point performance326.4 gflopsno data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro K1000M and Quadro RTX 6000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB24 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1800 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+no data

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+7.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K1000M 2.90
RTX 6000 73.28
+2427%
  • Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K1000M 773
RTX 6000 19538
+2428%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K1000M and Quadro RTX 6000. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 10 Mh/s no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p9no data
1080p18no data

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance rating 2.90 73.28
Novelty 1 June 2012 13 August 2018
Cost $119.9 $6299
Memory bus width 128 384
Pipelines / CUDA cores 192 4608
Memory bandwidth 28.8 672
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 45 Watt 260 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

since it shows better performance.

Be aware that Quadro K1000M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Competitors of Quadro K1000M by AMD

The nearest Quadro K1000M's AMD equivalent is FirePro W4170M, which is faster by 19% and higher by 51 positions in our rating.

AMD FirePro W4170M FirePro W4170M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro K1000M:

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M 100

Competitors of Quadro RTX 6000 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX 6000 from AMD is Radeon Pro W6800, which is slower by 2% and lower by 6 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon Pro W6800 Radeon Pro W6800
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 6000:

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


20 ratings
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
70 ratings
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.