Quadro RTX 6000 vs Quadro K5000M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5000M with Quadro RTX 6000, including specs and performance data.

K5000M
2012
4 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
7.28

RTX 6000 outperforms K5000M by a whopping 564% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54871
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.685.97
Power efficiency5.0012.77
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK104TU102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date7 August 2012 (12 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$329.99 $6,299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

RTX 6000 has 123% better value for money than K5000M.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13444608
Core clock speed601 MHz1440 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate67.31509.8
Floating-point processing power1.615 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs112288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed750 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth96 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K5000M 7.28
RTX 6000 48.36
+564%

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K5000M 2806
RTX 6000 18633
+564%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

K5000M 5107
RTX 6000 148323
+2804%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
−493%
350−400
+493%

Cost per frame, $

1080p5.59
+222%
18.00
−222%
  • K5000M has 222% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Atomic Heart 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−533%
190−200
+533%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−519%
130−140
+519%
Fortnite 40−45
−559%
270−280
+559%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−545%
200−210
+545%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−540%
160−170
+540%
Valorant 70−75
−508%
450−500
+508%
Atomic Heart 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−533%
190−200
+533%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
−531%
700−750
+531%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Dota 2 50−55
−548%
350−400
+548%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−519%
130−140
+519%
Fortnite 40−45
−559%
270−280
+559%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−545%
200−210
+545%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
−540%
160−170
+540%
Metro Exodus 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−540%
160−170
+540%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Valorant 70−75
−508%
450−500
+508%
Battlefield 5 30−33
−533%
190−200
+533%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Dota 2 50−55
−548%
350−400
+548%
Far Cry 5 21−24
−519%
130−140
+519%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
−545%
200−210
+545%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−540%
160−170
+540%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Valorant 70−75
−508%
450−500
+508%
Fortnite 40−45
−559%
270−280
+559%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
−560%
350−400
+560%
Grand Theft Auto V 9−10
−511%
55−60
+511%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
−541%
250−260
+541%
Valorant 75−80
−541%
500−550
+541%
Battlefield 5 12−14
−554%
85−90
+554%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Far Cry 5 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
−525%
100−105
+525%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Fortnite 14−16
−543%
90−95
+543%
Atomic Heart 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−511%
110−120
+511%
Metro Exodus 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Valorant 35−40
−557%
230−240
+557%
Battlefield 5 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Dota 2 24−27
−540%
160−170
+540%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−536%
70−75
+536%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%
Fortnite 7−8
−543%
45−50
+543%

This is how K5000M and RTX 6000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 6000 is 493% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.28 48.36
Recency 7 August 2012 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 260 Watt

K5000M has 160% lower power consumption.

RTX 6000, on the other hand, has a 564.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 6000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K5000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5000M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro RTX 6000 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5000M
Quadro K5000M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 6000
Quadro RTX 6000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3
87 votes

Rate Quadro K5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7
134 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K5000M or Quadro RTX 6000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.