K1000M vs RTX 8000

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
0.47
 
0.57
Architecture
Kepler
 
Turing
GPU code name
N14P-Q1
 
TU102
Market segment
Mobile workstation
 
Workstation
Release date
1 June 2012 (9 years ago)
 
13 August 2018 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
$119.90
 
$9,999
Price now
$232 (1.9x MSRP)
 
$4921 (0.5x MSRP)

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
192
 
4608
Core clock speed
850 MHz
 
1395 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
 
1770 MHz
Number of transistors
1,270 million
 
18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
 
12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
45 Watt
 
260 Watt
Texture fill rate
13.60
 
509.8
Floating-point performance
326.4 gflops
 
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro K1000M and Quadro RTX 8000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size
medium sized
 
no data
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Length
no data
 
267 mm
Supplementary power connectors
no data
 
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
DDR3
 
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
2 GB
 
48 GB
Memory bus width
128 Bit
 
384 Bit
Memory clock speed
1800 MHz
 
14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
28.8 GB/s
 
672.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
 
4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus
+
 
-

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
12 (11_0)
 
12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
 
6.5
OpenGL
4.6
 
4.6
OpenCL
1.2
 
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
 
1.2.131
CUDA
+
 
7.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K1000M 2.86
RTX 8000 72.28 +2427.3%

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K1000M 770
RTX 8000 19477 +2429.5%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of Quadro K1000M and Quadro RTX 8000. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
10 Mh/s
 
no data

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

K1000M satisfies 71% minimum and 60% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
71%
Recommended
60%
Minimum
71%
Recommended
60%

RTX 8000 satisfies 100% minimum and 100% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
100%
Recommended
100%
Minimum
100%
Recommended
100%

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

 
K1000M
RTX 8000
900p
 
9
no data
1080p
 
18
no data

Competitors of Quadro K1000M from AMD

The nearest Quadro K1000M's AMD equivalent is FirePro W4170M, which is faster by 19% and higher by 51 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro K1000M:

Competitors of Quadro RTX 8000 from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to Quadro RTX 8000 from AMD is Radeon Pro W6800, which is slower by 8% and lower by 13 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro RTX 8000:

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro K1000M

Cheaper ($232 vs $4921)

Lower power consumption (45W vs 260W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Optimus (lowers energy usage by automatically switching between integrated and discrete NVIDIA GPU. Similar to AMD Enduro)

PhysX (hardware acceleration of physical simulation engine named PhysX)

CUDA (Compute Unified Device Architecture - an API for video card computing power usage in tasks different from 3D graphics processing. Can be used for physics simulation for instance)

Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000

2427.3% faster (about 25.5 times) in synthetic tests

Much newer (13 August 2018 vs 1 June 2012)

Wider memory bus (384 vs 128 bit)

More pipelines (4608 vs 192)

Higher memory bandwidth (672 vs 28.8 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 28 nm)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000, since it shows better performance.

Be aware that Quadro K1000M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K1000M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Like
Like

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of video cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more probable options to consider.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.