Quadro K1000M: specs and benchmarks

VS

Aggregate performance score

Quadro K1000M provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 1.73% of a leader's which is RTX PRO 5000 Blackwell.

Summary

NVIDIA started Quadro K1000M sales 1 June 2012 at a recommended price of $119.90. This is a Kepler architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB of DDR3 memory clocked at 0.9 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 28.8 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is a graphics card attached via MXM-A (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 45 Watt.

Primary details

Some basic facts about Quadro K1000M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.

Place in the ranking948
Place by popularitynot in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.20
Power efficiency3.10of 100.00 (Radeon 890M)
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameGK107
Market segmentMobile workstation
Release date1 June 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$119.90 of 14,999 (Quadro Plex 7000)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Quadro K1000M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro K1000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192of 960 (GeForce GTX 660)
Core clock speed850 MHzof 980 (GeForce GT 755M SLI)
Number of transistors1,270 millionof 100,000 million (Data Center GPU Max 1100)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 0.003 MB (Arc Graphics 140V)
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattof 235 (FirePro S9150)
Texture fill rate13.60of 1,968.0 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server)
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPSof 126 (RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server)
ROPs16of 512 (Moore Threads MTT S4000)
TMUs16of 896 (Data Center GPU Max 1350)
L1 Cache16 KBof 64 MB (Data Center GPU Max 1550)
L2 Cache256 KBof 408 MB (Data Center GPU Max 1350)

Form factor & compatibility

This section provides details about the physical dimensions of Quadro K1000M and its compatibility with other computer components. This information is useful when selecting a computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards, it includes details about the interface and bus (for motherboard compatibility) and additional power connectors (for power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sized
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of memory installed on Quadro K1000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.

Memory typeDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBof 288 GB (Radeon Instinct MI325X)
Memory bus width128 Bitof 384 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti)
Memory clock speed900 MHzof 16384000 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile)
Memory bandwidth28.8 GB/sof 983040 MB (GeForce RTX 5080)
Shared memory-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro K1000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by Quadro K1000M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+

API and SDK support

APIs supported by Quadro K1000M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.6
OpenCL1.2
Vulkan+
CUDA+

Benchmark performance

Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro K1000M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K1000M
1.73

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K1000M 764
Samples: 1046

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K1000M 1102

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K1000M 5165

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

K1000M 1754

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

K1000M 1509

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

K1000M 1335

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

K1000M 5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good Quadro K1000M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

900p9
Full HD18

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.66

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 4−5
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Far Cry 5 5−6
Fortnite 8−9
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
Valorant 35−40

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 4−5
Counter-Strike 2 2−3
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 35−40
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Dota 2 21−24
Far Cry 5 5−6
Fortnite 8−9
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
Forza Horizon 5 3−4
Grand Theft Auto V 3−4
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
Metro Exodus 3−4
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
Valorant 35−40

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 4−5
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
Dota 2 21−24
Far Cry 5 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
Hogwarts Legacy 7−8
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 10−12
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9
Valorant 35−40

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 8−9

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 5−6
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 16−18
Valorant 12−14

1440p
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
Far Cry 5 2−3
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
Hogwarts Legacy 2−3
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 3−4

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
Valorant 9−10

4K
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1
Dota 2 4−5
Far Cry 5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4

4K
Epic

Fortnite 3−4

Closest competitors

Quadro K1000M's performance relative to its closest rivals among mobile workstation graphics cards.


Quadro K2000M 130.64
FirePro M4150 130.06
FirePro M7740 108.09
Quadro K1000M 100
Quadro 2000M 99.42
Quadro K610M 93.06
Quadro K510M 83.82

AMD equivalent

According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro K1000M is FirePro M7740, which is faster by 8% and higher by 29 positions in our ranking.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro K1000M:

FirePro M4150 130.06
FirePro M7740 108.09
Quadro K1000M 100

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with Quadro K1000M according to our statistics.

All comparisons with Quadro K1000M

Community ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.7 90 votes

Rate Quadro K1000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1000M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.