Quadro FX 2700M vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Place in our rating
 
Value for money (0-100)
0.18
 
2.58
Architecture
G9x
 
Turing
GPU code name
NB9E-GLM2
 
N18E-G2R
Market segment
Mobile workstation
 
Laptop
Release date
14 August 2008 (13 years ago)
 
2 April 2020 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)
$99.95
 
no data
Price now
$296 (3x MSRP)
 
$812

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores
48
 
2560
Core clock speed
530 MHz
 
930 MHz
Boost clock speed
no data
 
1155 MHz
Number of transistors
505 million
 
13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology
65 nm
 
12 nm
Thermal design power (TDP)
65 Watt
 
80 Watt
Texture fill rate
12.72
 
184.8
Floating-point performance
127.2 gflops
 
no data

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on Quadro FX 2700M and GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size
large
 
large
Interface
MXM-HE
 
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
no data
 
None

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type
GDDR3
 
GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
 
8 GB
Memory bus width
256 Bit
 
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
800 MHz
 
11000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
51.14 GB/s
 
352.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
 
-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors
No outputs
 
No outputs
G-SYNC support
-
 
+

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready
no data
 
+

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
 
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model
4.0
 
6.5
OpenGL
3.3
 
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
 
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
 
1.2.140
CUDA
1.1
 
7.5

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 2700M 1.40
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 54.39 +3785%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

FX 2700M 2799
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 65101 +2225.9%

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 2700M 376
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q 14658 +3798.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FX 2700M satisfies 62% minimum and 54% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
62%
Recommended
54%
Minimum
62%
Recommended
54%

RTX 2070 Super Max-Q satisfies 100% minimum and 99% recommended requirements of all games known to us.

Minimum
100%
Recommended
99%
Minimum
100%
Recommended
99%

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

 
FX 2700M
RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
1080p
 
no data
106
1440p
 
no data
73
4K
 
no data
45

Competitors of Quadro FX 2700M from AMD

The nearest Quadro FX 2700M's AMD equivalent is FirePro M2000, which is faster by 6% and higher by 13 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro FX 2700M:

Competitors of GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q from AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q from AMD is Radeon RX 6600M, which is slower by 29% and lower by 49 positions in our rating.

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q:

Advantages of NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

Cheaper ($296 vs $812)

Lower power consumption (65W vs 80W), meaning that the rival with higher TDP might require a better cooler or other thermal solution.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q

3785% faster (about 39 times) in synthetic tests

Much newer (2 April 2020 vs 14 August 2008)

More pipelines (2560 vs 48)

Higher memory bandwidth (352 vs 51.14 GB/s)

Finer manufacturing process technology (12 vs 65 nm)

DLSS

Raytracing

VR Ready

G-SYNC (removes screen tearing by telling the display when to renew the image. Only works with G-SYNC compatible displays)

Vulkan (a contemporary API for graphics acceleration, based on now-discontinued Mantle)

So, which one is the better GPU?

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q, since it shows better performance.

Be aware that Quadro FX 2700M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Max-Q
Like
Like

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.