Radeon RX 5500M vs Quadro 5000M

Place in performance ranking	577	341
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation	0.08	9.14
Architecture	Fermi (2010−2014)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	Fermi	Navi 14 / R19M-E85
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	27 July 2010 (13 years ago)	29 September 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$3732	$998

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5500M has 11325% better value for money than Quadro 5000M.

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	320	1408
Core clock speed	405 MHz	1327 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1645 MHz
Number of transistors	3,100 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	85 Watt
Texture fill rate	16.20	144.8
Floating-point performance	518.4 gflops	no data

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Quadro 5000M and Radeon RX 5500M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1200 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	76.8 GB/s	224.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro 5000M 5.32

RX 5500M 14.19
+167%

Radeon RX 5500M outperforms Quadro 5000M by 167% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro 5000M 2059

RX 5500M 5493
+167%

Radeon RX 5500M outperforms Quadro 5000M by 167% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	21−24 −171%	57 +171%
1440p	16−18 −194%	47 +194%
4K	10−12 −200%	30 +200%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

9−10

−511%

55
+511%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −330%	43 +330%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1020%	56 +1020%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −206%	45−50 +206%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −453%	94 +453%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −378%	43 +378%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −236%	35−40 +236%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −225%	35−40 +225%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Hitman 3	12−14 −600%	84 +600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −570%	67 +570%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −530%	63 +530%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −131%	30−33 +131%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −729%	58 +729%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −300%	40 +300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −420%	26 +420%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −481%	93 +481%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −329%	73 +329%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −267%	33 +267%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −464%	62 +464%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −225%	35−40 +225%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
Hitman 3	12−14 −358%	55 +358%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −440%	54 +440%
Metro Exodus	8−9 −388%	39 +388%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−11 −220%	32 +220%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −346%	58 +346%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −555%	72 +555%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −629%	51 +629%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−11 −210%	31 +210%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −180%	14 +180%
Battlefield 5	16−18 −369%	75 +369%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −233%	30 +233%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −436%	59 +436%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 −325%	51 +325%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −194%	50−55 +194%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −309%	45 +309%
Watch Dogs: Legion	7−8 −214%	22 +214%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 −338%	35 +338%
Hitman 3	9−10 −411%	46 +411%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−12 −209%	34 +209%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −733%	25 +733%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −233%	10−11 +233%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −300%	32 +300%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −400%	14−16 +400%
Battlefield 5	1−2 −4300%	44 +4300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −500%	48 +500%
Far Cry New Dawn	5−6 −840%	47 +840%
Forza Horizon 4	7−8 −300%	27−30 +300%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −1500%	16 +1500%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −400%	20 +400%
Hitman 3	5−6 −360%	23 +360%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	2−3 −650%	15 +650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −550%	12−14 +550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Battlefield 5	0−1	16
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	2−3
Far Cry 5	5−6 −120%	10−12 +120%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −257%	25 +257%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −375%	18−20 +375%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	5−6

This is how Quadro 5000M and RX 5500M compete in popular games:

RX 5500M is 171% faster than Quadro 5000M in 1080p
RX 5500M is 194% faster than Quadro 5000M in 1440p
RX 5500M is 200% faster than Quadro 5000M in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5500M is 4300% faster than the Quadro 5000M.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RX 5500M surpassed Quadro 5000M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & Cons Summary

Performance score	5.32	14.19
Recency	27 July 2010	29 September 2019
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Chip lithography	40 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	85 Watt