Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
NVIDIA Quadro 3000M: specs and benchmarks
Combined performance score
Summary
NVIDIA started Quadro 3000M sales 22 February 2011 at a recommended price of $398.96 . This is a Fermi architecture notebook card based on 40 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at designers. 2 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 625 GHz are supplied, and together with 256 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 80 GB/s.
Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via MXM-B (3.0) interface. Power consumption is at 75 Watt.
It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 2.63% of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090.
General info
Some basic facts about Quadro 3000M: architecture, market segment, release date etc.
Place in performance ranking | 774 | |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | |
Value for money | 0.14 | |
Architecture | Fermi (2010−2014) | |
GPU code name | Fermi | |
Market segment | Mobile workstation | |
Release date | 22 February 2011 (13 years old) | |
Launch price (MSRP) | $398.96 | |
Current price | $447 (1.1x MSRP) | of 168889 (A100 PCIe 80 GB) |
Technical specs
Quadro 3000M's specs such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Quadro 3000M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 240 | of 20480 (Data Center GPU Max NEXT) |
Core clock speed | 450 MHz | of 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT) |
Number of transistors | 1,950 million | of 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile) |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | of 4 (GeForce RTX 4080) |
Power consumption (TDP) | 75 Watt | of 2400 (Data Center GPU Max Subsystem) |
Texture fill rate | 18.00 | of 969.9 (H100 SXM5 96 GB) |
Floating-point performance | 432.0 gflops | of 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo) |
Size and compatibility
Information on Quadro 3000M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.
Laptop size | large | |
Interface | MXM-B (3.0) |
Memory
Parameters of memory installed on Quadro 3000M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM instead.
Memory type | GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | of 192 (Radeon Instinct MI300X) |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | of 19000 (GeForce RTX 3080 12 GB) |
Memory clock speed | 625 MHz | of 23000 (GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER) |
Memory bandwidth | 80 GB/s | of 3276 (Aldebaran) |
Shared memory | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on Quadro 3000M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference graphics cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model, while non-reference desktop models can (though not necessarily will) bear a different set of video ports.
Display Connectors | No outputs |
API support
APIs supported by Quadro 3000M, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | |
Shader Model | 5.1 | |
OpenGL | 4.6 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | 2.1 |
Benchmark performance
Synthetic benchmark performance of Quadro 3000M. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
3DMark Vantage Performance
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.
Benchmark coverage: 9%
Octane Render OctaneBench
This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.
Benchmark coverage: 4%
Send your test results of Quadro 3000M.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good Quadro 3000M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.
Average FPS across all PC games
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:
Full HD | 51 |
Performance in popular games
Full HD
Low Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 |
Full HD
Medium Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | |
Hitman 3 | 5−6 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
Full HD
High Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | |
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 12−14 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | |
Hitman 3 | 5−6 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 4−5 | |
Metro Exodus | 4−5 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 6−7 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 9−10 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 3−4 | |
Battlefield 5 | 5−6 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 5−6 | |
Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 3−4 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 6−7 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 6−7 | |
Watch Dogs: Legion | 1−2 |
1440p
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 5−6 | |
Hitman 3 | 5−6 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 10−11 | |
Metro Exodus | 1−2 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 | |
Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 6−7 |
1440p
Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | |
Far Cry 5 | 4−5 | |
Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | |
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 3−4 |
4K
High Preset
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 2−3 | |
Hitman 3 | 3−4 | |
Horizon Zero Dawn | 8−9 | |
Red Dead Redemption 2 | 1−2 |
4K
Ultra Preset
Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 1−2 | |
Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 1−2 | |
Cyberpunk 2077 | 0−1 | |
Far Cry 5 | 4−5 | |
Far Cry New Dawn | 6−7 |
Relative perfomance
Overall Quadro 3000M performance compared to nearest competitors among mobile workstation video cards.
AMD equivalent
According to our data, the closest AMD alternative to Quadro 3000M is FirePro W4170M, which is faster by 2% and higher by 6 positions in our ranking.
Here are some closest AMD rivals to Quadro 3000M:
Similar GPUs
Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.
Recommended processors
These processors are most commonly used with Quadro 3000M according to our statistics.