FirePro S9010 vs Quadro 3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking892not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency2.46no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGF104Tahiti
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date22 February 2011 (15 years ago)24 August 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$398.96 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2401792
Core clock speed450 MHz800 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate18.0089.60
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS2.867 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs40112
L1 Cache320 KB448 KB
L2 Cache512 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB3 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s240.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA2.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2011 24 August 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 200 Watt

Quadro 3000M has 167% lower power consumption.

FirePro S9010, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 43% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 3000M and FirePro S9010. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 3000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while FirePro S9010 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 51 votes

Rate Quadro 3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 1 vote

Rate FirePro S9010 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 3000M or FirePro S9010, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.