RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation vs Quadro 3000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking890not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.11no data
Power efficiency2.46no data
ArchitectureFermi (2010−2014)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGF104AD104
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date22 February 2011 (14 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$398.96 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores2405120
Core clock speed450 MHz1725 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2250 MHz
Number of transistors1,950 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate18.00360.0
Floating-point processing power0.432 TFLOPS23.04 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs40160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L1 Cache320 KB5 MB
L2 Cache512 KB48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed625 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA2.18.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 February 2011 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 100 Watt

Quadro 3000M has 33.3% lower power consumption.

RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro 3000M and RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro 3000M is a mobile workstation graphics card while RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro 3000M
Quadro 3000M
NVIDIA RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation
RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 50 votes

Rate Quadro 3000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 4 votes

Rate RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro 3000M or RTX 3500 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.