Radeon R7 265 vs Iris Xe Graphics G7

Aggregated performance score

Iris Xe Graphics G7
2020
10.67
+3.2%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Radeon R7 265 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary Details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking393402
Place by popularity16not in top-100
Cost-Effectiveness Evaluationno data1.68
ArchitectureGen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameTiger Lake XePitcairn
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Designno datareference
Release date15 August 2020 (3 years ago)13 February 2014 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149
Current priceno data$242 (1.6x MSRP)

Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed Specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores961024
Boost clock speedno data925 MHz
Number of transistorsno data2,800 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data150 Watt
Texture fill rateno data59.20
Floating-point performanceno data1,894 gflops

Form Factor & Compatibility

Information on Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon R7 265 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1 x 6-pin

VRAM Capacity and Type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR4GDDR5
Maximum RAM amountno data4 GB
Memory bus widthno data256 Bit
Memory clock speedno data1400 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data179.2 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and Outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Eyefinityno data1
HDMIno data+
DisplayPort supportno data-

Supported GPU Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

AppAccelerationno data-
CrossFireno data1
Endurono data-
FreeSyncno data1
HD3Dno data-
PowerTuneno data-
TrueAudiono data-
ZeroCoreno data-
DDMA audiono data+
Quick Sync+no data

API Compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXDirectX 12_1DirectX® 12
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Mantleno data-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Iris Xe Graphics G7 10.67
+3.2%
R7 265 10.34

Iris Xe Graphics G7 outperforms Radeon R7 265 by 3% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Iris Xe Graphics G7 4820
R7 265 5220
+8.3%

Radeon R7 265 outperforms Iris Xe Graphics G7 by 8% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21−24
+9.5%
21−24
−9.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%
Battlefield 5 35−40
+20%
30−33
−20%
Far Cry 5 27−30
+12.5%
24−27
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+7.4%
27−30
−7.4%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+8.6%
35−40
−8.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+4.8%
21−24
−4.8%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
+7.1%
14−16
−7.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Battlefield 5 18−20
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 16−18
+6.3%
16−18
−6.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+11.1%
18−20
−11.1%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Metro Exodus 4−5
+33.3%
3−4
−33.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

Pros & Cons Summary


Performance score 10.67 10.34
Recency 15 August 2020 13 February 2014
Chip lithography 10 nm 28 nm

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Radeon R7 265.

Be aware that Iris Xe Graphics G7 is a notebook card while Radeon R7 265 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for Your Favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


Intel Iris Xe Graphics G7
Iris Xe Graphics G7
AMD Radeon R7 265
Radeon R7 265

Comparisons with Similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community Ratings

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 2093 votes

Rate Iris Xe Graphics G7 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 346 votes

Rate Radeon R7 265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & Сomments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.