Arc A550M vs Iris Xe Graphics G7
Aggregate performance score
We've compared Iris Xe Graphics G7 and Arc A550M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
A550M outperforms Graphics G7 by a whopping 139% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
Place in the ranking | 487 | 271 |
Place by popularity | 19 | not in top-100 |
Power efficiency | no data | 28.78 |
Architecture | Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022) | Generation 12.7 (2022−2023) |
GPU code name | Tiger Lake Xe | DG2-512 |
Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
Release date | 15 August 2020 (5 years ago) | 2022 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
Pipelines / CUDA cores | 96 | 2048 |
Core clock speed | no data | 900 MHz |
Boost clock speed | no data | 2050 MHz |
Number of transistors | no data | 21,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 10 nm | 6 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 60 Watt |
Texture fill rate | no data | 262.4 |
Floating-point processing power | no data | 8.397 TFLOPS |
ROPs | no data | 64 |
TMUs | no data | 128 |
Tensor Cores | no data | 256 |
Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
L1 Cache | no data | 3 MB |
L2 Cache | no data | 8 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
Interface | no data | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type | DDR4 | GDDR6 |
Maximum RAM amount | no data | 8 GB |
Memory bus width | no data | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | no data | 1750 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | no data | 224.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | + | - |
Resizable BAR | - | + |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
Display Connectors | no data | Portable Device Dependent |
Supported technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
Quick Sync | + | no data |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
DirectX | DirectX 12_1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
Shader Model | no data | 6.6 |
OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
OpenCL | no data | 3.0 |
Vulkan | - | 1.3 |
DLSS | - | + |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Medium
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−119%
|
90−95
+119%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−142%
|
75−80
+142%
|
Fortnite | 55−60
−98.3%
|
110−120
+98.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−119%
|
90−95
+119%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−157%
|
90−95
+157%
|
Valorant | 90−95
−76.1%
|
160−170
+76.1%
|
Full HD
High
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−119%
|
90−95
+119%
|
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 140−150
−74.5%
|
250−260
+74.5%
|
Dota 2 | 65−70
−73.9%
|
120−130
+73.9%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−142%
|
75−80
+142%
|
Fortnite | 55−60
−98.3%
|
110−120
+98.3%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−119%
|
90−95
+119%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 35−40
−133%
|
80−85
+133%
|
Metro Exodus | 18−20
−168%
|
50−55
+168%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−157%
|
90−95
+157%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−172%
|
65−70
+172%
|
Valorant | 90−95
−76.1%
|
160−170
+76.1%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 40−45
−119%
|
90−95
+119%
|
Dota 2 | 65−70
−73.9%
|
120−130
+73.9%
|
Far Cry 5 | 30−35
−142%
|
75−80
+142%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 40−45
−119%
|
90−95
+119%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 35−40
−157%
|
90−95
+157%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 24−27
−172%
|
65−70
+172%
|
Full HD
Epic
Fortnite | 55−60
−98.3%
|
110−120
+98.3%
|
1440p
High
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 70−75
−126%
|
160−170
+126%
|
Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16
−200%
|
40−45
+200%
|
Metro Exodus | 10−12
−182%
|
30−35
+182%
|
Valorant | 100−110
−87.7%
|
190−200
+87.7%
|
1440p
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 24−27
−171%
|
65−70
+171%
|
Far Cry 5 | 20−22
−165%
|
50−55
+165%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 21−24
−157%
|
55−60
+157%
|
1440p
Epic
Fortnite | 20−22
−175%
|
55−60
+175%
|
4K
High
Grand Theft Auto V | 21−24
−105%
|
40−45
+105%
|
Metro Exodus | 5−6
−280%
|
18−20
+280%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 10−12
−209%
|
30−35
+209%
|
Valorant | 50−55
−170%
|
130−140
+170%
|
4K
Ultra
Battlefield 5 | 12−14
−200%
|
35−40
+200%
|
Dota 2 | 35−40
−120%
|
75−80
+120%
|
Far Cry 5 | 10−11
−170%
|
27−30
+170%
|
Forza Horizon 4 | 16−18
−150%
|
40−45
+150%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 9−10
−167%
|
24−27
+167%
|
4K
Epic
Fortnite | 9−10
−178%
|
24−27
+178%
|
Full HD
Low
Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Full HD
Medium
Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Full HD
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 130−140
+0%
|
130−140
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Forza Horizon 5 | 70−75
+0%
|
70−75
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Full HD
Ultra
Cyberpunk 2077 | 50−55
+0%
|
50−55
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
Valorant | 160−170
+0%
|
160−170
+0%
|
1440p
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 45−50
+0%
|
45−50
+0%
|
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 170−180
+0%
|
170−180
+0%
|
1440p
Ultra
Cyberpunk 2077 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 24−27
+0%
|
24−27
+0%
|
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 35−40
+0%
|
35−40
+0%
|
4K
High
Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
4K
Ultra
Counter-Strike 2 | 21−24
+0%
|
21−24
+0%
|
Cyberpunk 2077 | 10−11
+0%
|
10−11
+0%
|
Hogwarts Legacy | 14−16
+0%
|
14−16
+0%
|
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Arc A550M is 280% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Arc A550M performs better in 42 tests (64%)
- there's a draw in 24 tests (36%)
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.