Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile vs HD Graphics 2000

Place in the ranking	1210	200
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	no data	53.86
Architecture	Generation 6.0 (2011)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	Sandy Bridge GT1	AD107
Market segment	Desktop	Mobile workstation
Release date	1 February 2011 (13 years ago)	26 February 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	48	2048
Core clock speed	850 MHz	1485 MHz
Boost clock speed	1350 MHz	2025 MHz
Number of transistors	189 million	18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	32 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	unknown	35 Watt
Texture fill rate	8.100	129.6
Floating-point processing power	0.1296 TFLOPS	8.294 TFLOPS
ROPs	1	32
TMUs	6	64
Tensor Cores	no data	64
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Width	IGP	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	System Shared	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	System Shared	4 GB
Memory bus width	System Shared	64 Bit
Memory clock speed	System Shared	2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	128.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

Portable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_1)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	4.1	6.8
OpenGL	3.1	4.6
OpenCL	N/A	3.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
CUDA	-	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

HD Graphics 2000 0.55

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 27.27
+4858%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

HD Graphics 2000 896

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile 66297
+7303%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

−4445%

500−550
+4445%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−4650%

95−100
+4650%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −4567%	140−150 +4567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4650%	95−100 +4650%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −4650%	95−100 +4650%
Hitman 3	4−5 −4650%	190−200 +4650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −4275%	350−400 +4275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −4650%	190−200 +4650%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −4721%	1350−1400 +4721%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −4567%	140−150 +4567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4650%	95−100 +4650%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −4650%	95−100 +4650%
Hitman 3	4−5 −4650%	190−200 +4650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −4275%	350−400 +4275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −4650%	190−200 +4650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −4344%	400−450 +4344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −4721%	1350−1400 +4721%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −4567%	140−150 +4567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4650%	95−100 +4650%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −4650%	95−100 +4650%
Hitman 3	4−5 −4650%	190−200 +4650%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −4275%	350−400 +4275%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −4650%	190−200 +4650%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −4344%	400−450 +4344%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −4721%	1350−1400 +4721%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Hitman 3	6−7 −4733%	290−300 +4733%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −4650%	95−100 +4650%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−4650%

95−100
+4650%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −4400%	45−50 +4400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−4650%

95−100
+4650%

This is how HD Graphics 2000 and Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile compete in popular games:

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is 4445% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.55	27.27
Recency	1 February 2011	26 February 2024
Chip lithography	32 nm	5 nm

Nvidia RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile has a 4858.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 540% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that HD Graphics 2000 is a desktop card while RTX 500 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.