Radeon 820M vs GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile and Radeon 820M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

RTX 5060 Mobile
2025
8 GB GDDR7, 45 Watt
43.48
+3271%

RTX 5060 Mobile outperforms 820M by a whopping 3271% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking941050
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency73.68no data
ArchitectureBlackwell 2.0 (2025)RDNA 3+ (2024)
GPU code nameGB206Krackan Point
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date20 May 2025 (less than a year ago)2 June 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3328128
Core clock speed952 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1455 MHz2900 MHz
Number of transistors21,900 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology5 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate151.3no data
Floating-point processing power9.684 TFLOPSno data
ROPs48no data
TMUs104no data
Tensor Cores104no data
Ray Tracing Cores26no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 5.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR7no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1500 MHz7500 MHz
Memory bandwidth384.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device Dependentno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)no data
Shader Model6.8no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL3.0no data
Vulkan1.4-
CUDA12.0-
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD99
+4850%
2−3
−4850%
1440p51
+5000%
1−2
−5000%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+3286%
7−8
−3286%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+3367%
3−4
−3367%
God of War 110−120
+1733%
6−7
−1733%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+7000%
2−3
−7000%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+3286%
7−8
−3286%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+3367%
3−4
−3367%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+4533%
3−4
−4533%
Fortnite 180−190
+4600%
4−5
−4600%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+2013%
8−9
−2013%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+13600%
1−2
−13600%
God of War 110−120
+1733%
6−7
−1733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+1744%
9−10
−1744%
Valorant 240−250
+648%
30−35
−648%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+7000%
2−3
−7000%
Counter-Strike 2 230−240
+3286%
7−8
−3286%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+827%
30−33
−827%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+3367%
3−4
−3367%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+4533%
3−4
−4533%
Fortnite 180−190
+4600%
4−5
−4600%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+2013%
8−9
−2013%
Forza Horizon 5 130−140
+13600%
1−2
−13600%
God of War 110−120
+1733%
6−7
−1733%
Grand Theft Auto V 144
+14300%
1−2
−14300%
Metro Exodus 100−110
+5250%
2−3
−5250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+1744%
9−10
−1744%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+2229%
7−8
−2229%
Valorant 240−250
+648%
30−35
−648%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 140−150
+7000%
2−3
−7000%
Cyberpunk 2077 100−110
+3367%
3−4
−3367%
Far Cry 5 130−140
+4533%
3−4
−4533%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+2013%
8−9
−2013%
God of War 110−120
+1733%
6−7
−1733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+1744%
9−10
−1744%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 160−170
+2229%
7−8
−2229%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 180−190
+4600%
4−5
−4600%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
+3733%
3−4
−3733%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+3750%
8−9
−3750%
Grand Theft Auto V 106
+3433%
3−4
−3433%
Metro Exodus 65−70
+6500%
1−2
−6500%
Valorant 270−280
+5460%
5−6
−5460%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+3533%
3−4
−3533%
Cyberpunk 2077 50−55 0−1
Far Cry 5 100−110
+10700%
1−2
−10700%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+4233%
3−4
−4233%
God of War 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 110−120
+5850%
2−3
−5850%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 50−55
+5200%
1−2
−5200%
Grand Theft Auto V 95−100
+553%
14−16
−553%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+4000%
1−2
−4000%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+3500%
2−3
−3500%
Valorant 260−270
+3686%
7−8
−3686%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+3450%
2−3
−3450%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27 0−1
Far Cry 5 60−65
+5900%
1−2
−5900%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+4300%
2−3
−4300%
God of War 35−40 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 65−70
+3150%
2−3
−3150%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 60−65
+2900%
2−3
−2900%

This is how RTX 5060 Mobile and Radeon 820M compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5060 Mobile is 4850% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5060 Mobile is 5000% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Grand Theft Auto V, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the RTX 5060 Mobile is 14300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RTX 5060 Mobile surpassed Radeon 820M in all 42 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 43.48 1.29
Recency 20 May 2025 2 June 2024
Chip lithography 5 nm 4 nm

RTX 5060 Mobile has a 3270.5% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.

Radeon 820M, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 820M in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile
AMD Radeon 820M
Radeon 820M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 104 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon 820M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile or Radeon 820M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.