GRID M3-3020 vs GeForce RTX 3070

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce RTX 3070 with GRID M3-3020, including specs and performance data.

RTX 3070
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 220 Watt
53.60
+653%

RTX 3070 outperforms GRID M3-3020 by a whopping 653% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking51544
Place by popularity46not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation56.86no data
Power efficiency17.88no data
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Maxwell (2014−2017)
GPU code nameGA104GM107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 September 2020 (4 years ago)18 May 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5888640
Core clock speed1500 MHz1033 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1306 MHz
Number of transistors17,400 million1,870 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)220 Wattno data
Texture fill rate317.452.24
Floating-point processing power20.31 TFLOPS1.672 TFLOPS
ROPs9616
TMUs18440
Tensor Cores184no data
Ray Tracing Cores46no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length242 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 12-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB4 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1750 MHz1300 MHz
Memory bandwidth448.0 GB/s83.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.21.1.126
CUDA8.55.0
DLSS+-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD148
+722%
18−20
−722%
1440p99
+725%
12−14
−725%
4K63
+688%
8−9
−688%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.37no data
1440p5.04no data
4K7.92no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 280−290
+706%
35−40
−706%
Cyberpunk 2077 147
+717%
18−20
−717%
Hogwarts Legacy 130−140
+713%
16−18
−713%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 149
+728%
18−20
−728%
Counter-Strike 2 330
+725%
40−45
−725%
Cyberpunk 2077 139
+672%
18−20
−672%
Far Cry 5 154
+756%
18−20
−756%
Fortnite 230−240
+687%
30−33
−687%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+663%
27−30
−663%
Forza Horizon 5 159
+657%
21−24
−657%
Hogwarts Legacy 125
+681%
16−18
−681%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+738%
21−24
−738%
Valorant 290−300
+740%
35−40
−740%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 132
+725%
16−18
−725%
Counter-Strike 2 257
+757%
30−33
−757%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+694%
35−40
−694%
Cyberpunk 2077 126
+688%
16−18
−688%
Dota 2 133
+731%
16−18
−731%
Far Cry 5 148
+722%
18−20
−722%
Fortnite 230−240
+687%
30−33
−687%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+663%
27−30
−663%
Forza Horizon 5 148
+722%
18−20
−722%
Grand Theft Auto V 139
+672%
18−20
−672%
Hogwarts Legacy 105
+775%
12−14
−775%
Metro Exodus 120
+757%
14−16
−757%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+738%
21−24
−738%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 230
+667%
30−33
−667%
Valorant 290−300
+740%
35−40
−740%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 119
+750%
14−16
−750%
Cyberpunk 2077 102
+750%
12−14
−750%
Dota 2 125
+681%
16−18
−681%
Far Cry 5 141
+683%
18−20
−683%
Forza Horizon 4 200−210
+663%
27−30
−663%
Hogwarts Legacy 81
+710%
10−11
−710%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+738%
21−24
−738%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 121
+656%
16−18
−656%
Valorant 237
+690%
30−33
−690%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 230−240
+687%
30−33
−687%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 167
+695%
21−24
−695%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400
+672%
50−55
−672%
Grand Theft Auto V 98
+717%
12−14
−717%
Metro Exodus 75
+733%
9−10
−733%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+733%
21−24
−733%
Valorant 300−350
+730%
40−45
−730%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 103
+758%
12−14
−758%
Cyberpunk 2077 62
+675%
8−9
−675%
Far Cry 5 125
+681%
16−18
−681%
Forza Horizon 4 160−170
+705%
21−24
−705%
Hogwarts Legacy 63
+688%
8−9
−688%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120
+750%
14−16
−750%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 140−150
+728%
18−20
−728%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 43
+760%
5−6
−760%
Grand Theft Auto V 117
+736%
14−16
−736%
Hogwarts Legacy 35−40
+800%
4−5
−800%
Metro Exodus 49
+717%
6−7
−717%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+800%
10−11
−800%
Valorant 300−350
+668%
40−45
−668%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70
+678%
9−10
−678%
Counter-Strike 2 65−70
+667%
9−10
−667%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+900%
3−4
−900%
Dota 2 125
+681%
16−18
−681%
Far Cry 5 70
+678%
9−10
−678%
Forza Horizon 4 120−130
+757%
14−16
−757%
Hogwarts Legacy 35
+775%
4−5
−775%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95
+675%
12−14
−675%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75−80
+680%
10−11
−680%

This is how RTX 3070 and GRID M3-3020 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is 722% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 3070 is 725% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 3070 is 688% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 53.60 7.12
Recency 1 September 2020 18 May 2016
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 28 nm

RTX 3070 has a 652.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GRID M3-3020 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce RTX 3070 is a desktop card while GRID M3-3020 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
NVIDIA GRID M3-3020
GRID M3-3020

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 12290 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate GRID M3-3020 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce RTX 3070 or GRID M3-3020, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.