Tesla M40 24 GB vs GeForce RTX 3070

Place in performance ranking	31	185
Place by popularity	46	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	25.93	34.43
Architecture	Ampere (2020−2022)	Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019)
GPU code name	Ampere GA104	GM200
Market segment	Desktop	Workstation
Release date	16 September 2020 (3 years ago)	10 November 2015 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$499	no data
Current price	$662 (1.3x MSRP)	$250

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Tesla M40 24 GB has 33% better value for money than RTX 3070.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	5888	3072
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1725 MHz	1112 MHz
Number of transistors	17,400 million	8,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	8 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	250 Watt
Texture fill rate	317.4	213.5

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 4.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	242 mm	267 mm
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	1x 12-pin	8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	384 Bit
Memory clock speed	14000 MHz	6 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	448.0 GB/s	288.4 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort	No outputs
HDMI	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 Ultimate (12_2)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.7
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	2.0	3.0
Vulkan	1.2	1.3
CUDA	8.5	5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RTX 3070 57.96
+115%

Tesla M40 24 GB 26.97

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Tesla M40 24 GB by 115% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RTX 3070 22389
+115%

Tesla M40 24 GB 10417

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms Tesla M40 24 GB by 115% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	145 +123%	65−70 −123%
1440p	99 +120%	45−50 −120%
4K	64 +137%	27−30 −137%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

147

+126%

65−70
−126%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	125 +127%	55−60 −127%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	100 +122%	45−50 −122%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +116%	85−90 −116%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +118%	50−55 −118%
Cyberpunk 2077	139 +132%	60−65 −132%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +120%	50−55 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +115%	65−70 −115%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +125%	85−90 −125%
Hitman 3	109 +118%	50−55 −118%
Horizon Zero Dawn	288 +122%	130−140 −122%
Metro Exodus	144 +122%	65−70 −122%
Red Dead Redemption 2	118 +136%	50−55 −136%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	311 +122%	140−150 −122%
Watch Dogs: Legion	121 +120%	55−60 −120%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	107 +138%	45−50 −138%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	87 +118%	40−45 −118%
Battlefield 5	180−190 +116%	85−90 −116%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +118%	50−55 −118%
Cyberpunk 2077	126 +129%	55−60 −129%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +120%	50−55 −120%
Far Cry New Dawn	140−150 +115%	65−70 −115%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +125%	85−90 −125%
Hitman 3	100 +122%	45−50 −122%
Horizon Zero Dawn	240−250 +120%	110−120 −120%
Metro Exodus	133 +122%	60−65 −122%
Red Dead Redemption 2	117 +134%	50−55 −134%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	255 +132%	110−120 −132%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	230 +130%	100−105 −130%
Watch Dogs: Legion	178 +123%	80−85 −123%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	81 +131%	35−40 −131%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	78 +123%	35−40 −123%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	100−110 +118%	50−55 −118%
Cyberpunk 2077	102 +127%	45−50 −127%
Far Cry 5	110−120 +120%	50−55 −120%
Forza Horizon 4	190−200 +125%	85−90 −125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	181 +126%	80−85 −126%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	223 +123%	100−105 −123%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	121 +120%	55−60 −120%
Watch Dogs: Legion	85 +143%	35−40 −143%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

116

+132%

50−55
−132%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	120−130 +127%	55−60 −127%
Far Cry New Dawn	144 +122%	65−70 −122%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	68 +127%	30−33 −127%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	65 +117%	30−33 −117%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	90−95 +130%	40−45 −130%
Cyberpunk 2077	62 +130%	27−30 −130%
Far Cry 5	119 +116%	55−60 −116%
Forza Horizon 4	130−140 +118%	60−65 −118%
Hitman 3	96 +140%	40−45 −140%
Horizon Zero Dawn	146 +125%	65−70 −125%
Metro Exodus	101 +124%	45−50 −124%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	166 +121%	75−80 −121%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	95−100 +118%	45−50 −118%
Watch Dogs: Legion	66 +120%	30−33 −120%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

114

+128%

50−55
−128%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65−70 +117%	30−33 −117%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 +129%	24−27 −129%
Hitman 3	52 +117%	24−27 −117%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 +137%	35−40 −137%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	62 +130%	27−30 −130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	90 +125%	40−45 −125%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	48 +129%	21−24 −129%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	43 +139%	18−20 −139%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	40−45 +128%	18−20 −128%
Cyberpunk 2077	30 +150%	12−14 −150%
Far Cry 5	35−40 +138%	16−18 −138%
Forza Horizon 4	85−90 +123%	40−45 −123%
Horizon Zero Dawn	89 +123%	40−45 −123%
Metro Exodus	71 +137%	30−33 −137%
Watch Dogs: Legion	38 +138%	16−18 −138%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

69
+130%

30−33

−130%

This is how RTX 3070 and Tesla M40 24 GB compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 is 123% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 is 120% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 is 137% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	57.96	26.97
Recency	16 September 2020	10 November 2015
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	24 GB
Chip lithography	8 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	220 Watt	250 Watt