GeForce RTX 3070 vs NVS 810

Place in performance ranking	727	31
Place by popularity	not in top-100	46
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.11	25.95
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code name	GM107	Ampere GA104
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	4 November 2015 (8 years ago)	16 September 2020 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$499
Current price	$848	$662 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RTX 3070 has 23491% better value for money than NVS 810.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	512	5888
Core clock speed	902 MHz	1500 MHz
Boost clock speed	1033 MHz	1725 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	220 Watt
Texture fill rate	33.06	317.4
Floating-point performance	2x 1,058 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	198 mm	242 mm
Width	1-slot	2-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	14.4 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	8x mini-DisplayPort	1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	5.1	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2
CUDA	5.0	8.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 810 3.05

RTX 3070 57.97
+1801%

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms NVS 810 by 1801% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

NVS 810 1179

RTX 3070 22388
+1799%

GeForce RTX 3070 outperforms NVS 810 by 1799% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	7−8 −1971%	145 +1971%
1440p	5−6 −1880%	99 +1880%
4K	3−4 −2033%	64 +2033%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

7−8
−2000%

147

+2000%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 −1983%	125 +1983%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −1900%	100 +1900%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −1944%	180−190 +1944%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −2080%	100−110 +2080%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −1886%	139 +1886%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2100%	110−120 +2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −1810%	190−200 +1810%
Hitman 3	5−6 −2080%	109 +2080%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −1957%	288 +1957%
Metro Exodus	7−8 −1957%	144 +1957%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1867%	118 +1867%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −1844%	311 +1844%
Watch Dogs: Legion	6−7 −1917%	121 +1917%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −2040%	107 +2040%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −2075%	87 +2075%
Battlefield 5	9−10 −1944%	180−190 +1944%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −2080%	100−110 +2080%
Cyberpunk 2077	6−7 −2000%	126 +2000%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2100%	110−120 +2100%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1900%	140−150 +1900%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −1810%	190−200 +1810%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1900%	100 +1900%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −1917%	240−250 +1917%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −2117%	133 +2117%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −1850%	117 +1850%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −2025%	255 +2025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −1817%	230 +1817%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −1878%	178 +1878%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 −1925%	81 +1925%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −1850%	78 +1850%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −2080%	100−110 +2080%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −1940%	102 +1940%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −2100%	110−120 +2100%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −1810%	190−200 +1810%
Horizon Zero Dawn	9−10 −1911%	181 +1911%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−11 −2130%	223 +2130%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	6−7 −1917%	121 +1917%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −2025%	85 +2025%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7
−1833%

116

+1833%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	6−7 −1983%	120−130 +1983%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −1957%	144 +1957%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2167%	68 +2167%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 −2067%	65 +2067%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5 −2200%	90−95 +2200%
Cyberpunk 2077	3−4 −1967%	62 +1967%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −1883%	119 +1883%
Forza Horizon 4	6−7 −2083%	130−140 +2083%
Hitman 3	5−6 −1820%	96 +1820%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −1986%	146 +1986%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −1920%	101 +1920%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −1975%	166 +1975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	5−6 −1860%	95−100 +1860%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −2100%	66 +2100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

5−6
−2180%

114

+2180%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −2067%	65−70 +2067%
Far Cry New Dawn	2−3 −2650%	55−60 +2650%
Hitman 3	2−3 −2500%	52 +2500%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −1975%	80−85 +1975%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4 −1967%	62 +1967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −2150%	90 +2150%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −2300%	48 +2300%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 −2050%	43 +2050%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −1950%	40−45 +1950%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −2900%	30 +2900%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −3700%	35−40 +3700%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 −2125%	85−90 +2125%
Horizon Zero Dawn	4−5 −2125%	89 +2125%
Metro Exodus	3−4 −2267%	71 +2267%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −3700%	38 +3700%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

3−4

−2200%

69
+2200%

This is how NVS 810 and RTX 3070 compete in popular games:

RTX 3070 is 1971% faster in 1080p
RTX 3070 is 1880% faster in 1440p
RTX 3070 is 2033% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	3.05	57.97
Recency	4 November 2015	16 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	68 Watt	220 Watt