Playstation 3 RSX 90nm vs GeForce MX250

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking579not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency42.80no data
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameGP108BRSX-CXD2953
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date20 February 2019 (5 years ago)11 November 2006 (18 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384no data
Core clock speed937 MHz500 MHz
Boost clock speed1038 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,800 million300 million
Manufacturing process technology14 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate24.9112.00
Floating-point processing power0.7972 TFLOPSno data
ROPs168
TMUs2424

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x4IGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.06 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)N/A
Shader Model6.7 (6.4)no data
OpenGL4.6ES 1.1
OpenCL3.0N/A
Vulkan1.3N/A
CUDA6.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 20 February 2019 11 November 2006
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 14 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 80 Watt

GeForce MX250 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 542.9% more advanced lithography process, and 700% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce MX250 and Playstation 3 RSX 90nm. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce MX250
GeForce MX250
NVIDIA Playstation 3 RSX 90nm
Playstation 3 RSX 90nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 1550 votes

Rate GeForce MX250 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 42 votes

Rate Playstation 3 RSX 90nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.