Tesla M2090 vs GeForce GTX 980M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 980M with Tesla M2090, including specs and performance data.

GTX 980M
2014
8 GB GDDR5
19.03
+100%

GTX 980M outperforms Tesla M2090 by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking275433
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation9.950.56
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGM204GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date7 October 2014 (9 years ago)25 July 2011 (12 years ago)
Current price$583 $1844

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 980M has 1677% better value for money than Tesla M2090.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536512
CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed1038 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed1127 MHzno data
Number of transistors5,200 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)unknown250 Watt
Texture fill rate51.8441.66
Floating-point performance3,462 gflops1,331.2 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 980M and Tesla M2090 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizelargeno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data248 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount8 GB6 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2500 MHz3696 MHz
Memory bandwidth160 GB/s177.4 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
VGA аnalog display support+no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support+no data
HDMI+no data
G-SYNC support+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GameStream+no data
GeForce ShadowPlay+no data
GPU Boost2.0no data
GameWorks+no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+no data
Optimus+no data
BatteryBoost+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_0)
Shader Model6.45.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA+2.0

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 980M 19.03
+100%
Tesla M2090 9.50

GeForce GTX 980M outperforms Tesla M2090 by 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 980M 66
+34.7%
Tesla M2090 49

GeForce GTX 980M outperforms Tesla M2090 by 35% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p173
+104%
85−90
−104%
Full HD74
+111%
35−40
−111%
1440p31
+121%
14−16
−121%
4K28
+133%
12−14
−133%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
+113%
24−27
−113%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Battlefield 5 67
+123%
30−33
−123%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Far Cry 5 62
+107%
30−33
−107%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
+119%
27−30
−119%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+111%
35−40
−111%
Hitman 3 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+114%
35−40
−114%
Metro Exodus 65
+117%
30−33
−117%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+107%
30−33
−107%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 44
+110%
21−24
−110%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Battlefield 5 57
+111%
27−30
−111%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Far Cry 5 52
+117%
24−27
−117%
Far Cry New Dawn 47
+124%
21−24
−124%
Forza Horizon 4 191
+101%
95−100
−101%
Hitman 3 35−40
+106%
18−20
−106%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+114%
35−40
−114%
Metro Exodus 55
+104%
27−30
−104%
Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+107%
30−33
−107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+103%
30−33
−103%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 26
+117%
12−14
−117%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−35
+129%
14−16
−129%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−33
+114%
14−16
−114%
Far Cry 5 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 47
+124%
21−24
−124%
Horizon Zero Dawn 75−80
+114%
35−40
−114%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60−65
+107%
30−33
−107%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 33
+106%
16−18
−106%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+115%
27−30
−115%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 50−55
+117%
24−27
−117%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 33
+106%
16−18
−106%
Far Cry New Dawn 35
+119%
16−18
−119%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+122%
9−10
−122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 24−27
+140%
10−11
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−12
+120%
5−6
−120%
Far Cry 5 34
+113%
16−18
−113%
Forza Horizon 4 39
+117%
18−20
−117%
Hitman 3 21−24
+120%
10−11
−120%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+117%
18−20
−117%
Metro Exodus 38
+111%
18−20
−111%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+111%
18−20
−111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12−14
+117%
6−7
−117%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
+121%
14−16
−121%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16
+129%
7−8
−129%
Far Cry New Dawn 17
+113%
8−9
−113%
Hitman 3 14−16
+133%
6−7
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 22
+120%
10−11
−120%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 12
+140%
5−6
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 26
+117%
12−14
−117%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
+110%
10−11
−110%
Metro Exodus 20
+122%
9−10
−122%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+167%
3−4
−167%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%

This is how GTX 980M and Tesla M2090 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 980M is 104% faster in 900p
  • GTX 980M is 111% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 980M is 121% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 980M is 133% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.03 9.50
Recency 7 October 2014 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm

The GeForce GTX 980M is our recommended choice as it beats the Tesla M2090 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 980M is a notebook card while Tesla M2090 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980M
GeForce GTX 980M
NVIDIA Tesla M2090
Tesla M2090

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 319 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 980M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 29 votes

Rate Tesla M2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.