GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs 775M

Place in performance ranking	442	257
Place by popularity	not in top-100	80
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.71	18.31
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N13E-GTX-A2	N18P-G62
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	24 September 2013 (10 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	$780	$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has 971% better value for money than GTX 775M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	1024
Core clock speed	719 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	3540 Million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	no data	95.04

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 775M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.140
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 775M 9.30

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.17
+117%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 775M by 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 775M 3593

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 7796
+117%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 775M by 117% in Passmark.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 775M 6071

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+119%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 775M by 119% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −142%	58 +142%
1440p	18−21 −144%	44 +144%
4K	12−14 −125%	27 +125%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

14−16

−321%

59
+321%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −221%	61 +221%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −277%	49 +277%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −128%	65−70 +128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −165%	53 +165%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −229%	46 +229%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −146%	69 +146%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −236%	84 +236%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −106%	65−70 +106%
Hitman 3	21−24 −295%	83 +295%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −271%	115 +271%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −237%	91 +237%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −69.2%	44 +69.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −265%	95 +265%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −275%	60 +275%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −142%	46 +142%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −146%	32 +146%
Battlefield 5	27−30 −128%	65−70 +128%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −220%	64 +220%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −157%	36 +157%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −150%	70 +150%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −136%	59 +136%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −106%	65−70 +106%
Hitman 3	21−24 −114%	45 +114%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −194%	91 +194%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −130%	62 +130%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −61.5%	42 +61.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	24−27 −138%	62 +138%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −279%	72 +279%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −225%	52 +225%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −42.1%	27 +42.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −15.4%	15 +15.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20−22 −55%	31 +55%
Cyberpunk 2077	14−16 −143%	34 +143%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −39.3%	39 +39.3%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 −106%	65−70 +106%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−35 −106%	64 +106%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −111%	57 +111%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	18−20 −105%	39 +105%
Watch Dogs: Legion	16−18 −37.5%	22 +37.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

24−27

−57.7%

41
+57.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −117%	35−40 +117%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −167%	40−45 +167%
Hitman 3	12−14 −125%	27 +125%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −183%	17 +183%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −163%	21−24 +163%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −280%	18−20 +280%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 −136%	24−27 +136%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −300%	16 +300%
Far Cry 5	14−16 −127%	30−35 +127%
Forza Horizon 4	16−18 −129%	35−40 +129%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −116%	40−45 +116%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −192%	35−40 +192%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −273%	40−45 +273%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −156%	21−24 +156%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −180%	14−16 +180%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5	21−24 −109%	46 +109%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −175%	21−24 +175%
Hitman 3	5−6 −220%	16 +220%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	5−6 −260%	18 +260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 −257%	25 +257%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −140%	12−14 +140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −150%	10−11 +150%
Battlefield 5	7−8 −300%	28 +300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 −200%	14−16 +200%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −500%	6 +500%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −155%	27−30 +155%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −120%	21−24 +120%
Metro Exodus	10−11 −90%	18−20 +90%
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4 −167%	8−9 +167%