GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs 770M SLI

Place in performance ranking	337	257
Place by popularity	not in top-100	80
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	22.04	18.34
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	no data	N18P-G62
Market segment	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	30 May 2013 (11 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Current price	$149	$892

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 770M SLI has 20% better value for money than GTX 1650 Ti Mobile.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1920	1024
Core clock speed	811 MHz	1350 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1485 MHz
Number of transistors	2x 2540 Million	6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	150 Watt	50 Watt (50 - 80 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate	no data	95.04

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 770M SLI and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	no data	PCIe 3.0 x16
SLI options	+	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	2x 3 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	2x 192 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	4000 MHz	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

no data

No outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	no data	6.5
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	1.2
Vulkan	no data	1.2.140
CUDA	+	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 770M SLI 14.41

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 20.19
+40.1%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 770M SLI by 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 770M SLI 9569

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile 13266
+38.6%

1650 Ti Mobile outperforms 770M SLI by 39% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	40−45 −45%	58 +45%
1440p	30−35 −56.7%	47 +56.7%
4K	16−18 −43.8%	23 +43.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

40−45

−47.5%

59
+47.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −52.5%	61 +52.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −63.3%	49 +63.3%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −46.7%	65−70 +46.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −51.4%	53 +51.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	30−33 −53.3%	46 +53.3%
Far Cry 5	45−50 −53.3%	69 +53.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	55−60 −52.7%	84 +52.7%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −51.7%	90−95 +51.7%
Hitman 3	35−40 −45.7%	51 +45.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	80−85 −43.8%	115 +43.8%
Metro Exodus	60−65 −51.7%	91 +51.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−33 −46.7%	44 +46.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 −46.2%	95 +46.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −50%	60 +50%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −53.3%	46 +53.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 −52.4%	32 +52.4%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −46.7%	65−70 +46.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 −56.7%	47 +56.7%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −50%	36 +50%
Far Cry 5	40−45 −45%	58 +45%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 −47.5%	59 +47.5%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −51.7%	90−95 +51.7%
Hitman 3	30−33 −50%	45 +50%
Horizon Zero Dawn	120−130 −50%	180 +50%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −51.1%	68 +51.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	27−30 −55.6%	42 +55.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −50%	75 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	50−55 −44%	72 +44%
Watch Dogs: Legion	130−140 −40.8%	183 +40.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	18−20 −50%	27 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −50%	15 +50%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 −47.6%	31 +47.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	24−27 −41.7%	34 +41.7%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −44.4%	39 +44.4%
Forza Horizon 4	60−65 −51.7%	90−95 +51.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −42.2%	64 +42.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	40−45 −57.5%	63 +57.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −44.4%	39 +44.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −57.1%	22 +57.1%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

27−30

−51.9%

41
+51.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	27−30 −44.4%	35−40 +44.4%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −48.1%	40−45 +48.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −50%	21−24 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −44.4%	24−27 +44.4%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 −60%	16 +60%
Far Cry 5	24−27 −41.7%	30−35 +41.7%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −44.4%	35−40 +44.4%
Hitman 3	18−20 −55.6%	28 +55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −51.9%	40−45 +51.9%
Metro Exodus	27−30 −40.7%	35−40 +40.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −55.6%	40−45 +55.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −43.8%	21−24 +43.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	9−10 −55.6%	14−16 +55.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−57.1%

30−35
+57.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	14−16 −42.9%	20−22 +42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −42.9%	20 +42.9%
Hitman 3	10−11 −60%	16 +60%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −50%	18 +50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −56.3%	25 +56.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −50%	12−14 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −42.9%	10−11 +42.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −50%	6 +50%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −50%	12 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −55.6%	27−30 +55.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −57.1%	21−24 +57.1%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −58.3%	18−20 +58.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%