GeForce RTX 4080 vs GTX 775M

Place in the ranking	470	2
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	no data	28.64
Power efficiency	6.51	19.36
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code name	N13E-GTX-A2	AD103
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	24 September 2013 (11 years ago)	20 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	no data	$1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	9728
Core clock speed	719 MHz	2205 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	2505 MHz
Number of transistors	3540 Million	45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	320 Watt
Texture fill rate	no data	761.5
Floating-point processing power	no data	48.74 TFLOPS
ROPs	no data	112
TMUs	no data	304
Tensor Cores	no data	304
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	no data	PCIe 4.0 x16
Length	no data	310 mm
Width	no data	3-slot
Supplementary power connectors	no data	1x 16-pin
SLI options	+	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	3600 MHz	1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	no data	716.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	no data	1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	no data	6.7
OpenGL	no data	4.6
OpenCL	no data	3.0
Vulkan	-	1.3
CUDA	+	8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 775M 9.45

RTX 4080 90.00
+852%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 775M 3634

RTX 4080 34598
+852%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 775M 6071

RTX 4080 86267
+1321%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	24−27 −888%	237 +888%
1440p	16−18 −931%	165 +931%
4K	10−12 −970%	107 +970%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	no data	5.06
1440p	no data	7.27
4K	no data	11.21

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −1033%	200−210 +1033%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −1183%	231 +1183%
Elden Ring	27−30 −915%	274 +915%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −277%	110−120 +277%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −1106%	217 +1106%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −539%	115 +539%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −1287%	527 +1287%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −592%	173 +592%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −524%	150−160 +524%
Valorant	35−40 −2046%	751 +2046%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −277%	110−120 +277%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −1022%	202 +1022%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −483%	105 +483%
Dota 2	30−35 −491%	201 +491%
Elden Ring	27−30 −1456%	420 +1456%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −297%	155 +297%
Fortnite	55−60 −460%	300−350 +460%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −1247%	512 +1247%
Grand Theft Auto V	30−35 −424%	178 +424%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −588%	172 +588%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −191%	210−220 +191%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −524%	150−160 +524%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −500%	170−180 +500%
Valorant	35−40 −1611%	550−600 +1611%
World of Tanks	130−140 −102%	270−280 +102%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	30−35 −277%	110−120 +277%
Counter-Strike 2	18−20 −939%	187 +939%
Cyberpunk 2077	18−20 −428%	95 +428%
Dota 2	30−35 −585%	233 +585%
Far Cry 5	35−40 −354%	170−180 +354%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 −1163%	480 +1163%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	70−75 −191%	210−220 +191%
Valorant	35−40 −1543%	575 +1543%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−12 −1373%	162 +1373%
Elden Ring	12−14 −1792%	246 +1792%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 −1250%	162 +1250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	45−50 −289%	170−180 +289%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 −1063%	90−95 +1063%
World of Tanks	65−70 −659%	500−550 +659%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 −383%	85−90 +383%
Counter-Strike 2	10−11 −1150%	125 +1150%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −829%	65 +829%
Far Cry 5	20−22 −700%	160−170 +700%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 −1850%	390 +1850%
Metro Exodus	16−18 −776%	149 +776%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 −1636%	191 +1636%
Valorant	24−27 −1921%	485 +1921%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −2575%	107 +2575%
Dota 2	20−22 −825%	185 +825%
Elden Ring	6−7 −2367%	148 +2367%
Grand Theft Auto V	20−22 −825%	185 +825%
Metro Exodus	5−6 −1980%	104 +1980%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	27−30 −674%	200−210 +674%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −967%	60−65 +967%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20−22 −825%	185 +825%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	8−9 −1038%	90−95 +1038%
Counter-Strike 2	4−5 −3050%	120−130 +3050%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −1500%	32 +1500%
Dota 2	20−22 −1035%	227 +1035%
Far Cry 5	10−12 −855%	100−110 +855%
Fortnite	10−11 −860%	95−100 +860%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 −1673%	195 +1673%
Valorant	9−10 −2622%	245 +2622%

This is how GTX 775M and RTX 4080 compete in popular games:

RTX 4080 is 888% faster in 1080p
RTX 4080 is 931% faster in 1440p
RTX 4080 is 970% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4080 is 3050% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, RTX 4080 surpassed GTX 775M in all 63 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	9.45	90.00
Recency	24 September 2013	20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	16 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	320 Watt

GTX 775M has 220% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080, on the other hand, has a 852.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 775M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 775M is a notebook card while GeForce RTX 4080 is a desktop one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.