Quadro T1000 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1660 Super

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Super with Quadro T1000 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Super
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
33.07
+90.3%

GTX 1660 Super outperforms T1000 Max-Q by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking160312
Place by popularity8not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation60.55no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTuring TU116N19P-Q1
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$229 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408768
Core clock speed1530 MHz795 / 1230 MHz
Boost clock speed1785 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt35 - 40 Watt
Texture fill rate157.175.60
Floating-point processing power5.027 gflops2.419 gflops
ROPs4832
TMUs8856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount6 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed14000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth336.0 GB/s80 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-
HDCP+-
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

NVENC+no data
Ansel+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.2
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1660 Super 33.07
+90.3%
T1000 Max-Q 17.38

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Super 12755
+90.2%
T1000 Max-Q 6705

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD95
+111%
45−50
−111%
1440p56
+107%
27−30
−107%
4K31
+93.8%
16−18
−93.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 76
+181%
27−30
−181%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 88
+126%
35−40
−126%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 66
+128%
27−30
−128%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+87.7%
55−60
−87.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 80
+129%
35−40
−129%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+133%
27−30
−133%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+80.5%
40−45
−80.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 121
+157%
45−50
−157%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+59.1%
110−120
−59.1%
Hitman 3 77
+133%
30−35
−133%
Horizon Zero Dawn 321
+273%
85−90
−273%
Metro Exodus 144
+140%
60−65
−140%
Red Dead Redemption 2 80
+70.2%
45−50
−70.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110−120
+105%
55−60
−105%
Watch Dogs: Legion 217
+155%
85−90
−155%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 135
+246%
35−40
−246%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 48
+65.5%
27−30
−65.5%
Battlefield 5 100−110
+87.7%
55−60
−87.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 72
+106%
35−40
−106%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+92.6%
27−30
−92.6%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+80.5%
40−45
−80.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 86
+83%
45−50
−83%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+59.1%
110−120
−59.1%
Hitman 3 75
+127%
30−35
−127%
Horizon Zero Dawn 290
+237%
85−90
−237%
Metro Exodus 118
+96.7%
60−65
−96.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 89
+89.4%
45−50
−89.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 129
+126%
55−60
−126%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+72.5%
40−45
−72.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 208
+145%
85−90
−145%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 51
+30.8%
35−40
−30.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 44
+51.7%
27−30
−51.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 49
+81.5%
27−30
−81.5%
Far Cry 5 70−75
+80.5%
40−45
−80.5%
Forza Horizon 4 107
−2.8%
110−120
+2.8%
Hitman 3 65
+97%
30−35
−97%
Horizon Zero Dawn 99
+15.1%
85−90
−15.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 112
+96.5%
55−60
−96.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 61
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 31
−174%
85−90
+174%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 57
+21.3%
45−50
−21.3%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+85.3%
30−35
−85.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 57
+111%
27−30
−111%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40
+122%
18−20
−122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 34
+127%
14−16
−127%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+100%
18−20
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+160%
10−11
−160%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+90%
20−22
−90%
Forza Horizon 4 190−200
+102%
90−95
−102%
Hitman 3 43
+105%
21−24
−105%
Horizon Zero Dawn 71
+103%
35−40
−103%
Metro Exodus 67
+109%
30−35
−109%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 80
+135%
30−35
−135%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+137%
18−20
−137%
Watch Dogs: Legion 196
+86.7%
100−110
−86.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 56
+93.1%
27−30
−93.1%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+94.1%
16−18
−94.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 31
+138%
12−14
−138%
Hitman 3 25
+92.3%
12−14
−92.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 66
−34.8%
85−90
+34.8%
Metro Exodus 44
+144%
18−20
−144%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 40
+135%
16−18
−135%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24
+140%
10−11
−140%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 18
+100%
9−10
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 19
+111%
9−10
−111%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
+267%
3−4
−267%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+111%
9−10
−111%
Forza Horizon 4 54
+125%
24−27
−125%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 44
+144%
18−20
−144%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+71.4%
7−8
−71.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 28
+86.7%
14−16
−86.7%

This is how GTX 1660 Super and T1000 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is 111% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 107% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Super is 94% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1660 Super is 273% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T1000 Max-Q is 174% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1660 Super is ahead in 69 tests (96%)
  • T1000 Max-Q is ahead in 3 tests (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 33.07 17.38
Recency 29 October 2019 27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 35 Watt

GTX 1660 Super has a 90.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 months, and a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1000 Max-Q, on the other hand, has 257.1% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1660 Super is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Super is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Super
GeForce GTX 1660 Super
NVIDIA Quadro T1000 Max-Q
Quadro T1000 Max-Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 18942 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 17 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.