RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs GeForce GTX 1650

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
19.80

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms GTX 1650 by a whopping 260% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking30222
Place by popularity3not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation32.234.81
Power efficiency18.828.48
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU117GB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date23 April 2019 (6 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$149 $8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1650 has 570% better value for money than RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89624064
Core clock speed1485 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1665 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate93.241,968
Floating-point processing power2.984 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs32192
TMUs56752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length229 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount4 GB96 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed2000 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth128.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.512.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 19.80
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 71.35
+260%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 7878
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 28386
+260%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD64
−259%
230−240
+259%
1440p38
−242%
130−140
+242%
4K24
−254%
85−90
+254%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.33
+1500%
37.24
−1500%
1440p3.92
+1580%
65.88
−1580%
4K6.21
+1523%
100.76
−1523%
  • GTX 1650 has 1500% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 has 1580% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 has 1523% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−218%
350−400
+218%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−241%
140−150
+241%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−259%
280−290
+259%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 61
−244%
210−220
+244%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−218%
350−400
+218%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−241%
140−150
+241%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−259%
280−290
+259%
Far Cry 5 69
−248%
240−250
+248%
Fortnite 211
−255%
750−800
+255%
Forza Horizon 4 90
−233%
300−310
+233%
Forza Horizon 5 73
−256%
260−270
+256%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90
−233%
300−310
+233%
Valorant 292
−260%
1050−1100
+260%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 53
−258%
190−200
+258%
Counter-Strike 2 110−120
−218%
350−400
+218%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
−245%
800−850
+245%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−241%
140−150
+241%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−259%
280−290
+259%
Dota 2 97
−209%
300−310
+209%
Far Cry 5 63
−249%
220−230
+249%
Fortnite 85
−253%
300−310
+253%
Forza Horizon 4 83
−249%
290−300
+249%
Forza Horizon 5 62
−255%
220−230
+255%
Grand Theft Auto V 81
−258%
290−300
+258%
Metro Exodus 35
−243%
120−130
+243%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 86
−249%
300−310
+249%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
−252%
250−260
+252%
Valorant 260
−246%
900−950
+246%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 51
−253%
180−190
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
−241%
140−150
+241%
Dead Island 2 75−80
−259%
280−290
+259%
Dota 2 92
−226%
300−310
+226%
Far Cry 5 59
−256%
210−220
+256%
Forza Horizon 4 65
−254%
230−240
+254%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 66
−248%
230−240
+248%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 41
−241%
140−150
+241%
Valorant 70
−257%
250−260
+257%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 61
−244%
210−220
+244%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
−250%
140−150
+250%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
−260%
500−550
+260%
Grand Theft Auto V 40
−250%
140−150
+250%
Metro Exodus 20
−250%
70−75
+250%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−251%
600−650
+251%
Valorant 177
−239%
600−650
+239%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 39
−259%
140−150
+259%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−233%
60−65
+233%
Dead Island 2 30−35
−253%
120−130
+253%
Far Cry 5 40
−250%
140−150
+250%
Forza Horizon 4 46
−248%
160−170
+248%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
−255%
110−120
+255%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 42
−257%
150−160
+257%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%
Grand Theft Auto V 33
−233%
110−120
+233%
Metro Exodus 12
−233%
40−45
+233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 26
−246%
90−95
+246%
Valorant 83
−249%
290−300
+249%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21
−257%
75−80
+257%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−253%
60−65
+253%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
−238%
27−30
+238%
Dead Island 2 18−20
−242%
65−70
+242%
Dota 2 59
−256%
210−220
+256%
Far Cry 5 19
−242%
65−70
+242%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−233%
100−105
+233%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 26
−246%
90−95
+246%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 11
−218%
35−40
+218%

This is how GTX 1650 and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 259% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 242% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 254% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.80 71.35
Recency 23 April 2019 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 600 Watt

GTX 1650 has 700% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 260.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 is a desktop card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
GeForce GTX 1650
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 25757 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.