RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell vs GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1660 Ti
2019
6 GB GDDR6, 120 Watt
32.44

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell outperforms GTX 1660 Ti by a whopping 120% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking19122
Place by popularity30not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation37.334.81
Power efficiency19.278.48
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameTU116GB202
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 February 2019 (6 years ago)18 March 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$279 $8,565

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

GTX 1660 Ti has 676% better value for money than RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153624064
Core clock speed1500 MHz1590 MHz
Boost clock speed1770 MHz2617 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate169.91,968
Floating-point processing power5.437 TFLOPS126 TFLOPS
ROPs48192
TMUs96752
Tensor Coresno data752
Ray Tracing Coresno data188

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length229 mm304 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount6 GB96 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.0 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI+-

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.4
CUDA7.512.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1660 Ti 32.44
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 71.35
+120%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1660 Ti 12907
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell 28386
+120%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD104
−112%
220−230
+112%
1440p59
−103%
120−130
+103%
4K39
−118%
85−90
+118%

Cost per frame, $

1080p2.68
+1351%
38.93
−1351%
1440p4.73
+1409%
71.38
−1409%
4K7.15
+1309%
100.76
−1309%
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 1351% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 1409% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • GTX 1660 Ti has 1309% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−95.5%
350−400
+95.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
−118%
170−180
+118%
Dead Island 2 130−140
−116%
300−310
+116%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 129
−117%
280−290
+117%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−95.5%
350−400
+95.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 71
−111%
150−160
+111%
Dead Island 2 130−140
−116%
300−310
+116%
Far Cry 5 109
−111%
230−240
+111%
Fortnite 247
−102%
500−550
+102%
Forza Horizon 4 131
−114%
280−290
+114%
Forza Horizon 5 107
−115%
230−240
+115%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 200
−100%
400−450
+100%
Valorant 190−200
−105%
400−450
+105%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 112
−114%
240−250
+114%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
−95.5%
350−400
+95.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
−117%
600−650
+117%
Cyberpunk 2077 57
−111%
120−130
+111%
Dead Island 2 130−140
−116%
300−310
+116%
Dota 2 181
−93.4%
350−400
+93.4%
Far Cry 5 99
−112%
210−220
+112%
Fortnite 143
−110%
300−310
+110%
Forza Horizon 4 122
−113%
260−270
+113%
Forza Horizon 5 94
−113%
200−210
+113%
Grand Theft Auto V 119
−118%
260−270
+118%
Metro Exodus 55
−118%
120−130
+118%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150
−100%
300−310
+100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 116
−116%
250−260
+116%
Valorant 190−200
−105%
400−450
+105%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 102
−116%
220−230
+116%
Cyberpunk 2077 46
−117%
100−105
+117%
Dead Island 2 130−140
−116%
300−310
+116%
Dota 2 168
−108%
350−400
+108%
Far Cry 5 94
−113%
200−210
+113%
Forza Horizon 4 97
−116%
210−220
+116%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 129
−117%
280−290
+117%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−110%
130−140
+110%
Valorant 118
−112%
250−260
+112%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 117
−114%
250−260
+114%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 70−75
−116%
160−170
+116%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
−106%
450−500
+106%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
−110%
130−140
+110%
Metro Exodus 33
−112%
70−75
+112%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−100%
350−400
+100%
Valorant 230−240
−116%
500−550
+116%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 76
−111%
160−170
+111%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
−104%
55−60
+104%
Dead Island 2 60−65
−110%
130−140
+110%
Far Cry 5 67
−109%
140−150
+109%
Forza Horizon 4 77
−108%
160−170
+108%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
−114%
120−130
+114%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 75
−113%
160−170
+113%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−106%
70−75
+106%
Dead Island 2 30−33
−117%
65−70
+117%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
−114%
120−130
+114%
Metro Exodus 21
−114%
45−50
+114%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 43
−109%
90−95
+109%
Valorant 180−190
−112%
400−450
+112%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 43
−109%
90−95
+109%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−106%
70−75
+106%
Cyberpunk 2077 11
−118%
24−27
+118%
Dead Island 2 30−33
−117%
65−70
+117%
Dota 2 94
−113%
200−210
+113%
Far Cry 5 35
−114%
75−80
+114%
Forza Horizon 4 51
−116%
110−120
+116%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 39
−118%
85−90
+118%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 25
−100%
50−55
+100%

This is how GTX 1660 Ti and RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell compete in popular games:

  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 112% faster in 1080p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 103% faster in 1440p
  • RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is 118% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 32.44 71.35
Recency 22 February 2019 18 March 2025
Maximum RAM amount 6 GB 96 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 600 Watt

GTX 1660 Ti has 400% lower power consumption.

RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, on the other hand, has a 119.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 140% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a desktop card while RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell
RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 8711 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1660 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 15 votes

Rate RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1660 Ti or RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.