Arc Graphics 130V vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and Arc Graphics 130V, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1650 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
15.99
+39.5%

GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Arc Graphics 130V by a considerable 40% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking332412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency38.49no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Xe²
GPU code nameTU117Lunar Lake iGPU
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)no data (2024 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10247
Core clock speed930 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1125 MHz1850 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Wattno data
Texture fill rate72.00no data
Floating-point processing power2.304 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5LPDDR5x
Maximum RAM amount4 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1751 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_2
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.2.140-
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 15.99
+39.5%
Arc Graphics 130V 11.46

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 6170
+39.5%
Arc Graphics 130V 4424

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD55
+66.7%
33
−66.7%
1440p26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
4K18
+50%
12−14
−50%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+40%
35−40
−40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Battlefield 5 63
+40%
45−50
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 42
+40%
30−33
−40%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Far Cry 5 48
+60%
30−33
−60%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
+47.5%
40−45
−47.5%
Forza Horizon 4 195
+50%
130−140
−50%
Hitman 3 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Metro Exodus 71
+42%
50−55
−42%
Red Dead Redemption 2 54
+54.3%
35−40
−54.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+47.3%
55−60
−47.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 69
+53.3%
45−50
−53.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Battlefield 5 55
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Far Cry 5 38
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Forza Horizon 4 179
+49.2%
120−130
−49.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Metro Exodus 58
+45%
40−45
−45%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+40.7%
27−30
−40.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+47.3%
55−60
−47.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Far Cry 5 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+57.1%
35−40
−57.1%
Hitman 3 30−35
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+45.5%
55−60
−45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 80−85
+47.3%
55−60
−47.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 42
+40%
30−33
−40%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 33
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+50%
6−7
−50%
Far Cry 5 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Forza Horizon 4 124
+45.9%
85−90
−45.9%
Hitman 3 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+57.1%
21−24
−57.1%
Metro Exodus 32
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+42.9%
21−24
−42.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+41.7%
12−14
−41.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 95−100
+40%
70−75
−40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 11
+57.1%
7−8
−57.1%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%
Hitman 3 12−14
+50%
8−9
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+47.3%
55−60
−47.3%
Metro Exodus 22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+50%
12−14
−50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
+60%
5−6
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+60%
5−6
−60%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 9
+50%
6−7
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
+60%
10−11
−60%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

This is how GTX 1650 Max-Q and Arc Graphics 130V compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 67% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 44% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 50% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.99 11.46
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 3 nm

GTX 1650 Max-Q has a 39.5% higher aggregate performance score.

Arc Graphics 130V, on the other hand, has a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 300% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Arc Graphics 130V in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Intel Arc Graphics 130V
Arc Graphics 130V

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 608 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 130V on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.