AMD Radeon RX 5300M vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 1650 Mobile
18.36
+65.3%

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 5300M by 65% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking279385
Place by popularity54not in top-100
Value for money39.9812.61
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code nameN18P-G0, N18P-G61Navi 14 / E19M-E65
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (4 years old)13 November 2019 (4 years old)
Current price$301 $525
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 Mobile has 217% better value for money than RX 5300M.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10241408
Core clock speed1380 MHz1036 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1445 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt65 Watt
Texture fill rate99.84127.2

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and Radeon RX 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedmedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz14000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s168.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2.131
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Mobile 18.36
+65.3%
RX 5300M 11.11

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 5300M by 65% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116
+65.2%
RX 5300M 4307

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 5300M by 65% in Passmark.

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1650 Mobile 31311
RX 5300M 39264
+25.4%

Radeon RX 5300M outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile by 25% in 3DMark Vantage Performance.

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GTX 1650 Mobile 13132
RX 5300M 14351
+9.3%

Radeon RX 5300M outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile by 9% in 3DMark 11 Performance GPU.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1650 Mobile 9313
RX 5300M 10306
+10.7%

Radeon RX 5300M outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile by 11% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1650 Mobile 57365
+2.7%
RX 5300M 55837

GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms Radeon RX 5300M by 3% in 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
−5.1%
62
+5.1%
1440p37
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
4K23
+91.7%
12−14
−91.7%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 52
+206%
16−18
−206%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55
−7.3%
59
+7.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+147%
16−18
−147%
Battlefield 5 60
−53.3%
92
+53.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 63
−14.3%
72
+14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+141%
16−18
−141%
Far Cry 5 60
+114%
27−30
−114%
Far Cry New Dawn 55
−25.5%
69
+25.5%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+110%
35−40
−110%
Hitman 3 69
+138%
27−30
−138%
Horizon Zero Dawn 53
+130%
21−24
−130%
Red Dead Redemption 2 48
+17.1%
41
−17.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
−3.4%
60
+3.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 48
+140%
20−22
−140%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+14.3%
42
−14.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Battlefield 5 60
−31.7%
79
+31.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 49
−6.1%
52
+6.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+88.2%
16−18
−88.2%
Far Cry 5 54
+92.9%
27−30
−92.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 55
−16.4%
64
+16.4%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+105%
35−40
−105%
Hitman 3 57
+96.6%
27−30
−96.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 39
+69.6%
21−24
−69.6%
Metro Exodus 33
−18.2%
39
+18.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+68.8%
16
−68.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 48
+14.3%
42
−14.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+3.3%
60
−3.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 42
+110%
20−22
−110%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
+20%
25
−20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
−113%
16−18
+113%
Battlefield 5 59
−20.3%
71
+20.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+76.5%
16−18
−76.5%
Far Cry 5 53
+89.3%
27−30
−89.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 51
−13.7%
58
+13.7%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+59%
35−40
−59%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
−5.6%
38
+5.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
−17.6%
20−22
+17.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+138%
16−18
−138%
Hitman 3 37
+118%
16−18
−118%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24
+41.2%
16−18
−41.2%
Metro Exodus 20
+122%
9−10
−122%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+75%
8−9
−75%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+114%
14−16
−114%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+100%
10−12
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%
Battlefield 5 47
+135%
20−22
−135%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+200%
5−6
−200%
Far Cry 5 35
+94.4%
18−20
−94.4%
Far Cry New Dawn 39
+105%
18−20
−105%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+76.2%
21−24
−76.2%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+100%
6−7
−100%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7
+0%
7−8
+0%
Hitman 3 19
+90%
10−11
−90%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Metro Exodus 12
+200%
4−5
−200%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+66.7%
6−7
−66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
+150%
6−7
−150%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+133%
9−10
−133%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+100%
6−7
−100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+80%
5−6
−80%
Battlefield 5 25
+150%
10−11
−150%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+400%
1−2
−400%
Far Cry 5 18
+100%
9−10
−100%
Far Cry New Dawn 19
+72.7%
10−12
−72.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%

This is how GTX 1650 Mobile and RX 5300M compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • RX 5300M is 5.1% faster than GTX 1650 Mobile

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 76.2% faster than RX 5300M

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 91.7% faster than RX 5300M

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GTX 1650 Mobile is 400% faster than the RX 5300M.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 5300M is 113% faster than the GTX 1650 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is ahead in 52 tests (76%)
  • RX 5300M is ahead in 15 tests (22%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 18.36 11.11
Recency 23 April 2019 13 November 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 65 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon RX 5300M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
AMD Radeon RX 5300M
Radeon RX 5300M

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 2868 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 92 votes

Rate AMD Radeon RX 5300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.