GeForce MX570 vs GTX 1650 Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1650 Mobile
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
18.51
+24.2%

GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms MX570 by a significant 24% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking302354
Place by popularity68not in top-100
Power efficiency25.5441.12
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 April 2020 (4 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed1380 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate99.8473.92
Floating-point processing power3.195 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs3240
TMUs6464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1500 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Mobile 18.51
+24.2%
GeForce MX570 14.90

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116
+24.2%
GeForce MX570 5729

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+73.5%
34
−73.5%
1440p36
+33.3%
27−30
−33.3%
4K23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 38
+46.2%
24−27
−46.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 52
+79.3%
27−30
−79.3%
Elden Ring 47
+4.4%
45−50
−4.4%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 66
+37.5%
45−50
−37.5%
Counter-Strike 2 33
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 35
+20.7%
27−30
−20.7%
Forza Horizon 4 79
+29.5%
60−65
−29.5%
Metro Exodus 55
+34.1%
40−45
−34.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+97.2%
35−40
−97.2%
Valorant 83
+40.7%
55−60
−40.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 72
+50%
45−50
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 27
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 28
−3.6%
27−30
+3.6%
Dota 2 72
+500%
12
−500%
Elden Ring 65
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Far Cry 5 62
−9.7%
68
+9.7%
Fortnite 95−100
+19.3%
80−85
−19.3%
Forza Horizon 4 64
+4.9%
60−65
−4.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 59
+11.3%
50−55
−11.3%
Metro Exodus 40
−2.5%
40−45
+2.5%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 165
+54.2%
100−110
−54.2%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
−33.3%
35−40
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60
+28.9%
45−50
−28.9%
Valorant 47
−25.5%
55−60
+25.5%
World of Tanks 130
−48.5%
190−200
+48.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 56
+16.7%
45−50
−16.7%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+26.9%
24−27
−26.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 25
−16%
27−30
+16%
Dota 2 89
+64.8%
50−55
−64.8%
Far Cry 5 73
+32.7%
55−60
−32.7%
Forza Horizon 4 55
−10.9%
60−65
+10.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 120−130
+18.7%
100−110
−18.7%
Valorant 75−80
+27.1%
55−60
−27.1%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 27−30
+38.1%
21−24
−38.1%
Elden Ring 30−33
+30.4%
21−24
−30.4%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+31.8%
21−24
−31.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
+26.5%
130−140
−26.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+30.8%
12−14
−30.8%
World of Tanks 120−130
+22.1%
100−110
−22.1%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 37
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+36.4%
10−12
−36.4%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+33.3%
35−40
−33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+30.6%
35−40
−30.6%
Metro Exodus 39
+21.9%
30−35
−21.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+31.6%
18−20
−31.6%
Valorant 45−50
+27%
35−40
−27%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Dota 2 30−35
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%
Elden Ring 12−14
+30%
10−11
−30%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%
Metro Exodus 12
+20%
10−11
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 47
+6.8%
40−45
−6.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+19.2%
24−27
−19.2%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 17
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Cyberpunk 2077 6
+50%
4−5
−50%
Dota 2 45
+73.1%
24−27
−73.1%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+26.3%
18−20
−26.3%
Fortnite 23
+35.3%
16−18
−35.3%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+28.6%
21−24
−28.6%
Valorant 21−24
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%

This is how GTX 1650 Mobile and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 74% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 33% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 28% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Mobile is 500% faster.
  • in World of Tanks, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 48% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is ahead in 55 tests (87%)
  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 8 tests (13%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.51 14.90
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 1650 Mobile has a 24.2% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 3364 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 93 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.