MX570 vs GTX 1650 Mobile

#ad
Buy
VS

Combined performance score

GTX 1650 Mobile
18.36
+18.2%

GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms MX570 by 18% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking279316
Place by popularity54not in top-100
Value for money39.99no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameN18P-G0, N18P-G61GN20-S5
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (4 years old)17 December 2021 (2 years old)
Current price$301 no data
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed1380 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1560 MHz1477 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt15-45 Watt
Texture fill rate99.8473.92

Size and compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile and GeForce MX570 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimusno data+

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Mobile 18.36
+18.2%
GeForce MX570 15.53

GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms MX570 by 18% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 Mobile 7116
+18.2%
GeForce MX570 6020

GTX 1650 Mobile outperforms MX570 by 18% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD59
+31.1%
45−50
−31.1%
1440p37
+23.3%
30−35
−23.3%
4K23
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 52
+117%
24−27
−117%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 55
+71.9%
30−35
−71.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 42
+61.5%
24−27
−61.5%
Battlefield 5 60
+13.2%
50−55
−13.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 63
+57.5%
40−45
−57.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 41
+70.8%
24−27
−70.8%
Far Cry 5 60
+46.3%
40−45
−46.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 55
+31%
40−45
−31%
Forza Horizon 4 82
+51.9%
50−55
−51.9%
Hitman 3 69
+60.5%
40−45
−60.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 53
+60.6%
30−35
−60.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 48
+84.6%
24−27
−84.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 58
+75.8%
30−35
−75.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 48
+65.5%
27−30
−65.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 48
+50%
30−35
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
−8.3%
24−27
+8.3%
Battlefield 5 60
+13.2%
50−55
−13.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 49
+22.5%
40−45
−22.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+33.3%
24−27
−33.3%
Far Cry 5 54
+31.7%
40−45
−31.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 55
+31%
40−45
−31%
Forza Horizon 4 80
+48.1%
50−55
−48.1%
Hitman 3 57
+32.6%
40−45
−32.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 39
+18.2%
30−35
−18.2%
Metro Exodus 33
+37.5%
24−27
−37.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27
+3.8%
24−27
−3.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 48
+45.5%
30−35
−45.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
+87.9%
30−35
−87.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 42
+44.8%
27−30
−44.8%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 30
−6.7%
30−35
+6.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8
−225%
24−27
+225%
Battlefield 5 59
+11.3%
50−55
−11.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Far Cry 5 53
+29.3%
40−45
−29.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 51
+21.4%
40−45
−21.4%
Forza Horizon 4 62
+14.8%
50−55
−14.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 36
+9.1%
30−35
−9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 17
−70.6%
27−30
+70.6%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 38
+65.2%
21−24
−65.2%
Hitman 3 37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+27.3%
10−12
−27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30
+50%
20−22
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 22
+37.5%
16−18
−37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%
Battlefield 5 47
+42.4%
30−35
−42.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 15
+87.5%
8−9
−87.5%
Far Cry 5 35
+40%
24−27
−40%
Far Cry New Dawn 39
+34.5%
27−30
−34.5%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+19.4%
30−35
−19.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+25%
16−18
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 12
+20%
10−11
−20%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7
−57.1%
10−12
+57.1%
Hitman 3 19
+35.7%
14−16
−35.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 8
−37.5%
10−12
+37.5%
Metro Exodus 12
+50%
8−9
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+25%
8−9
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 15
+50%
10−11
−50%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21
+40%
14−16
−40%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 12
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+28.6%
7−8
−28.6%
Battlefield 5 25
+47.1%
16−18
−47.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Far Cry 5 18
+50%
12−14
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 19
+26.7%
14−16
−26.7%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8−9
+33.3%
6−7
−33.3%

This is how GTX 1650 Mobile and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 31.1% faster than GeForce MX570

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 23.3% faster than GeForce MX570

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is 27.8% faster than GeForce MX570

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Cyberpunk 2077, with 1080p resolution and the Low Preset, the GTX 1650 Mobile is 117% faster than the GeForce MX570.
  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 225% faster than the GTX 1650 Mobile.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Mobile is ahead in 62 tests (91%)
  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 6 tests (9%)

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 18.36 15.53
Recency 23 April 2019 17 December 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 15 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 2866 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 63 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.