GeForce MX570 vs GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q MX450 25W MX450 30.5W 8Gbps MX450 30.5W 10Gbps
VS
MX570 MX570 A RTX 2050 Max-Q RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 3050 Max-Q RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Mobile RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 4 GB RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh 6 GB RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and GeForce MX570, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
16.63
+13.3%

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q outperforms MX570 by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking338363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency23.0640.74
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU117GA107
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)May 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10242048
Core clock speed1035 MHz832 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1155 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate76.8073.92
Floating-point processing power2.458 TFLOPS4.731 TFLOPS
ROPs3240
TMUs6464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s96 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus-+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.58.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.63
+13.3%
GeForce MX570 14.68

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6469
+13.3%
GeForce MX570 5712

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD58
+52.6%
38
−52.6%
1440p41
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
4K26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+11.7%
60−65
−11.7%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Far Cry 5 56
+19.1%
45−50
−19.1%
Fortnite 85−90
+10.1%
75−80
−10.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+12.1%
55−60
−12.1%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+13.2%
35−40
−13.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+13.7%
50−55
−13.7%
Valorant 120−130
+7.7%
110−120
−7.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Battlefield 5 65−70
+11.7%
60−65
−11.7%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 200−210
+8.4%
190−200
−8.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Dota 2 112
+25.8%
85−90
−25.8%
Far Cry 5 51
+8.5%
45−50
−8.5%
Fortnite 85−90
+10.1%
75−80
−10.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+12.1%
55−60
−12.1%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+13.2%
35−40
−13.2%
Grand Theft Auto V 67
+24.1%
54
−24.1%
Metro Exodus 31
+6.9%
27−30
−6.9%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+13.7%
50−55
−13.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54
+45.9%
35−40
−45.9%
Valorant 120−130
+7.7%
110−120
−7.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 65−70
+11.7%
60−65
−11.7%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+13.8%
27−30
−13.8%
Dota 2 106
+19.1%
85−90
−19.1%
Far Cry 5 48
+2.1%
45−50
−2.1%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+12.1%
55−60
−12.1%
Forza Horizon 5 40−45
+13.2%
35−40
−13.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 55−60
+13.7%
50−55
−13.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−6.3%
34
+6.3%
Valorant 120−130
+7.7%
110−120
−7.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 85−90
+10.1%
75−80
−10.1%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+11.5%
100−110
−11.5%
Grand Theft Auto V 26
+18.2%
21−24
−18.2%
Metro Exodus 20−22
+17.6%
16−18
−17.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 150−160
+19.1%
130−140
−19.1%
Valorant 150−160
+9.7%
140−150
−9.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+12.8%
35−40
−12.8%
Counter-Strike 2 18−20
+12.5%
16−18
−12.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 33
+10%
30−33
−10%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+14.7%
30−35
−14.7%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+12%
24−27
−12%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 35−40
+12.9%
30−35
−12.9%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Grand Theft Auto V 25
−4%
24−27
+4%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+20%
10−11
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Valorant 85−90
+14.5%
75−80
−14.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
+15%
20−22
−15%
Counter-Strike 2 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Dota 2 52
+4%
50−55
−4%
Far Cry 5 16
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Forza Horizon 4 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
+8.3%
12−14
−8.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 14−16
+15.4%
12−14
−15.4%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 16−18
+23.1%
12−14
−23.1%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and GeForce MX570 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 53% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 17% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 24% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 46% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the GeForce MX570 is 6% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 65 tests (97%)
  • GeForce MX570 is ahead in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 16.63 14.68
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 25 Watt

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q has a 13.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

GeForce MX570, on the other hand, has a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce MX570 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA GeForce MX570
GeForce MX570
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX 6300M Radeon RX 6300M
GeForce MX570 GeForce MX570
vs
GTX 970M GeForce GTX 970M
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
vs
RX Vega M GH Radeon RX Vega M GH
T600 T600
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
RTX A2000 RTX A2000
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Vega 7 Radeon Vega 7
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
RX 6400 Radeon RX 6400
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce MX550 GeForce MX550
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
RTX 3050 4 GB RTX 3050 4 GB
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
RTX 3050 8 GB RTX 3050 8 GB
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
Radeon 680M Radeon 680M
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
RX 6700S Radeon RX 6700S
vs
GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.8 215 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 94 votes

Rate GeForce MX570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q or GeForce MX570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.