T1000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

Place in performance ranking	304	262
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	10.55	39.08
Architecture	Turing (2018−2021)	Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code name	N18P-G62 Max-Q	TU117
Market segment	Laptop	Desktop
Release date	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)	6 May 2021 (3 years ago)
Current price	$1183	$119

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

T1000 has 270% better value for money than GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	896
Core clock speed	1035 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1200 MHz	1395 MHz
Number of transistors	4,700 million	4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology	12 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	35 Watt	50 Watt
Texture fill rate	76.80	78.12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and T1000 compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	10000 MHz	10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth	160.0 GB/s	160.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.5	6.6
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	1.2.140	1.2
CUDA	7.5	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.61

T1000 19.83
+19.4%

T1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 19% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6414

T1000 7658
+19.4%

T1000 outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by 19% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	54 −11.1%	60−65 +11.1%
1440p	28 −7.1%	30−35 +7.1%
4K	23 −17.4%	27−30 +17.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

−23.8%

24−27
+23.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40−45 −22.5%	49 +22.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	30−33 −26.7%	38 +26.7%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −20%	50−55 +20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	35−40 −28.6%	45 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −23.8%	24−27 +23.8%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −30%	35−40 +30%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −20%	75−80 +20%
Hitman 3	35−40 −28.6%	45 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	85−90 −25.9%	107 +25.9%
Metro Exodus	70−75 −22.9%	86 +22.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	50−55 −26%	63 +26%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	60−65 −28.3%	77 +28.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	40−45 −22.5%	49 +22.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	30−33 −36.7%	41 +36.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	18−20 −33.3%	24 +33.3%
Battlefield 5	45−50 −20%	50−55 +20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	27−30 −25.9%	34 +25.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −23.8%	24−27 +23.8%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −30%	35−40 +30%
Far Cry New Dawn	35−40 −28.6%	45−50 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −20%	75−80 +20%
Hitman 3	30−33 −20%	36 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −20%	65−70 +20%
Metro Exodus	45−50 −28.9%	58 +28.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	40−45 −32.5%	53 +32.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	50−55 −24%	62 +24%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	45−50 −20%	54 +20%
Watch Dogs: Legion	160−170 −20.6%	193 +20.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −35.7%	19 +35.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −20%	12 +20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	18−20 −22.2%	22 +22.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 −23.8%	24−27 +23.8%
Far Cry 5	30−33 −30%	35−40 +30%
Forza Horizon 4	65−70 −20%	75−80 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −26.7%	57 +26.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	45−50 −20%	54 +20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	24−27 −33.3%	32 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 −33.3%	16 +33.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

35−40

−31.4%

46
+31.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 −33.3%	30−35 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	24−27 −33.3%	30−35 +33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−11 −20%	12 +20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 −31.3%	21−24 +31.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Far Cry 5	27−30 −22.2%	33 +22.2%
Forza Horizon 4	24−27 −33.3%	30−35 +33.3%
Hitman 3	18−20 −38.9%	25 +38.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 −36.7%	41 +36.7%
Metro Exodus	24−27 −25%	30−33 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 −29.6%	35 +29.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion	10−11 −40%	14 +40%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24

−28.6%

27−30
+28.6%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Hitman 3	10−11 −40%	14 +40%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	12−14 −25%	15 +25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −25%	20 +25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −25%	10−11 +25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 −25%	5 +25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Forza Horizon 4	18−20 −27.8%	21−24 +27.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn	18−20 −22.2%	22 +22.2%
Metro Exodus	12−14 −33.3%	16−18 +33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%