T600 vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q with T600, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
2020
4 GB GDDR6, 50 Watt
16.68

T600 outperforms GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q by a minimal 1% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking327323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency22.8628.78
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameTU117TU117
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date2 April 2020 (4 years ago)6 May 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024640
Core clock speed1035 MHz735 MHz
Boost clock speed1200 MHz1335 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate76.8053.40
Floating-point processing power2.458 TFLOPS1.709 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs6440

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1250 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth160.0 GB/s160.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1401.2
CUDA7.57.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 16.68
T600 16.80
+0.7%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 6427
T600 6471
+0.7%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 11538
+32.7%
T600 8694

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 31116
T600 344838
+1008%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 8564
+30.7%
T600 6552

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 47657
+16.5%
T600 40917

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q 421834
+38.4%
T600 304731

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD57
+7.5%
53
−7.5%
1440p34
+36%
25
−36%
4K22
+10%
20
−10%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+28.9%
35−40
−28.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 38
+35.7%
27−30
−35.7%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 45
+32.4%
30−35
−32.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−0.9%
100−110
+0.9%
Hitman 3 45
+40.6%
30−35
−40.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 86
+50.9%
55−60
−50.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 63
+37%
45−50
−37%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 202
+143%
80−85
−143%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 24
−16.7%
27−30
+16.7%
Battlefield 5 50−55
−1.9%
55−60
+1.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 34
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−0.9%
100−110
+0.9%
Hitman 3 43
+34.4%
30−35
−34.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Metro Exodus 66
+15.8%
55−60
−15.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 46
+0%
45−50
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 62
+21.6%
51
−21.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 193
+133%
80−85
−133%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 19
−100%
35−40
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
−133%
27−30
+133%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 22
−54.5%
30−35
+54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
−0.9%
100−110
+0.9%
Hitman 3 38
+18.8%
30−35
−18.8%
Horizon Zero Dawn 57
+46.2%
39
−46.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 54
+20%
45
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+18.5%
27
−18.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16
−419%
80−85
+419%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 46
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 24−27
−4%
24−27
+4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12
−16.7%
14−16
+16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
−1.1%
90−95
+1.1%
Hitman 3 25
+25%
20−22
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 41
+51.9%
27
−51.9%
Metro Exodus 30−33
+0%
30−33
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35
+9.4%
32
−9.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Watch Dogs: Legion 130
+27.5%
100−110
−27.5%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
−3.7%
27−30
+3.7%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Hitman 3 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
+25%
16
−25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
−60%
8−9
+60%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+0%
3−4
+0%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 21
+16.7%
18
−16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+0%
7−8
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%

This is how GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and T600 compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 8% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 36% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 10% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is 143% faster.
  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the T600 is 419% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is ahead in 22 tests (31%)
  • T600 is ahead in 16 tests (22%)
  • there's a draw in 34 tests (47%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 16.68 16.80
Recency 2 April 2020 6 May 2021
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 40 Watt

T600 has a 0.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 25% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q and T600.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q is a notebook card while T600 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q
NVIDIA T600
T600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 210 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 682 votes

Rate T600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.