Radeon RX 6650M vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with Radeon RX 6650M, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
26.44

RX 6650M outperforms GTX 1650 SUPER by a considerable 48% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking210117
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Power efficiency18.2422.44
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU116Navi 23
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)4 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12801792
Core clock speed1530 MHz2068 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz2416 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million11,060 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate138.0270.6
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPS8.659 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs80112
Ray Tracing Coresno data28

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.5-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.44
RX 6650M 39.02
+47.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 10166
RX 6650M 15004
+47.6%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

GTX 1650 SUPER 18225
RX 6650M 32846
+80.2%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

GTX 1650 SUPER 12206
RX 6650M 25739
+111%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
−65.7%
116
+65.7%
1440p36
−38.9%
50−55
+38.9%
4K23
−30.4%
30−35
+30.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 61
−32.8%
80−85
+32.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
−102%
127
+102%
Elden Ring 76
+10.1%
69
−10.1%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−30%
100−110
+30%
Counter-Strike 2 48
−68.8%
80−85
+68.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
−12.8%
53
+12.8%
Forza Horizon 4 121
−83.5%
222
+83.5%
Metro Exodus 89
−5.6%
90−95
+5.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
+9.1%
75−80
−9.1%
Valorant 115
−35.7%
150−160
+35.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−30%
100−110
+30%
Counter-Strike 2 39
−108%
80−85
+108%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
−2.6%
39
+2.6%
Dota 2 138
+254%
39
−254%
Elden Ring 82
−67.1%
130−140
+67.1%
Far Cry 5 151
+228%
46
−228%
Fortnite 130−140
−31.5%
170−180
+31.5%
Forza Horizon 4 101
−88.1%
190
+88.1%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
−18.4%
120−130
+18.4%
Metro Exodus 61
+84.8%
33
−84.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−22.7%
200−210
+22.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
−157%
75−80
+157%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−58.6%
130−140
+58.6%
Valorant 100−110
−47.2%
150−160
+47.2%
World of Tanks 260−270
−6.1%
270−280
+6.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−30%
100−110
+30%
Counter-Strike 2 35
−131%
80−85
+131%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+0%
32
+0%
Dota 2 191
+91%
100
−91%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−22.8%
95−100
+22.8%
Forza Horizon 4 83
−101%
167
+101%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−22.7%
200−210
+22.7%
Valorant 100−110
−47.2%
150−160
+47.2%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45
−60%
70−75
+60%
Elden Ring 31
−155%
75−80
+155%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−60%
70−75
+60%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
−255%
35−40
+255%
World of Tanks 170−180
−42%
240−250
+42%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−35.8%
70−75
+35.8%
Counter-Strike 2 20
−95%
35−40
+95%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
−105%
35−40
+105%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−61.5%
120−130
+61.5%
Forza Horizon 4 60
−88.3%
110−120
+88.3%
Metro Exodus 55
−54.5%
85−90
+54.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−74.4%
65−70
+74.4%
Valorant 70−75
−69.4%
120−130
+69.4%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10
−300%
40−45
+300%
Dota 2 45
−71.1%
75−80
+71.1%
Elden Ring 17
−124%
35−40
+124%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
−71.1%
75−80
+71.1%
Metro Exodus 16
−106%
30−35
+106%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−55.6%
120−130
+55.6%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−47.1%
24−27
+47.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
−71.1%
75−80
+71.1%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−60.7%
45−50
+60.7%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
−66.7%
40−45
+66.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
−240%
16−18
+240%
Dota 2 80
+3.9%
75−80
−3.9%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−65.7%
55−60
+65.7%
Fortnite 30−35
−66.7%
55−60
+66.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30
−113%
60−65
+113%
Valorant 35−40
−82.9%
60−65
+82.9%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and RX 6650M compete in popular games:

  • RX 6650M is 66% faster in 1080p
  • RX 6650M is 39% faster in 1440p
  • RX 6650M is 30% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 SUPER is 254% faster.
  • in Counter-Strike 2, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the RX 6650M is 300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is ahead in 7 tests (11%)
  • RX 6650M is ahead in 54 tests (86%)
  • there's a draw in 2 tests (3%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.44 39.02
Recency 22 November 2019 4 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 120 Watt

GTX 1650 SUPER has 20% lower power consumption.

RX 6650M, on the other hand, has a 47.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 71.4% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6650M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while Radeon RX 6650M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
AMD Radeon RX 6650M
Radeon RX 6650M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4821 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 129 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6650M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.