RTX A2000 12 GB vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

Aggregate performance score

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 125 Watt
26.26

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by a substantial 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking190130
Place by popularity51not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation27.0510.88
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTU116GA106
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years ago)23 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$449
Current price$206 $967 (2.2x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 SUPER has 149% better value for money than RTX A2000 12 GB.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12803328
Core clock speed1530 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million12,000 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate138.0124.8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm167 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz12 GB/s
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s288.0 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort
HDMI+no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.26
RTX A2000 12 GB 35.48
+35.1%

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 35% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 SUPER 10152
RTX A2000 12 GB 13717
+35.1%

RTX A2000 12 GB outperforms GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER by 35% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
−28.6%
90−95
+28.6%
1440p34
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
4K23
−30.4%
30−35
+30.4%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 63
−34.9%
85−90
+34.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
−32.1%
70−75
+32.1%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−27.9%
110−120
+27.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
−29.3%
75−80
+29.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
−30%
65−70
+30%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−29%
80−85
+29%
Far Cry New Dawn 70−75
−33.8%
95−100
+33.8%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Hitman 3 105
−33.3%
140−150
+33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 157
−33.8%
210−220
+33.8%
Metro Exodus 69
−30.4%
90−95
+30.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
−31%
110−120
+31%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 121
−32.2%
160−170
+32.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
−33.8%
95−100
+33.8%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
−34.6%
35−40
+34.6%
Battlefield 5 85−90
−27.9%
110−120
+27.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
−29.3%
75−80
+29.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
−25%
50−55
+25%
Far Cry 5 151
−32.5%
200−210
+32.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 42
−31%
55−60
+31%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Hitman 3 59
−27.1%
75−80
+27.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn 122
−31.1%
160−170
+31.1%
Metro Exodus 83
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 74
−28.4%
95−100
+28.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 81
−23.5%
100−105
+23.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
−33.3%
120−130
+33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
−31.1%
80−85
+31.1%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
−27.5%
65−70
+27.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
−20%
18−20
+20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 55−60
−29.3%
75−80
+29.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Far Cry 5 60−65
−29%
80−85
+29%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 83
−32.5%
110−120
+32.5%
Metro Exodus 76
−31.6%
100−105
+31.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
−30%
65−70
+30%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 66
−28.8%
85−90
+28.8%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−30%
65−70
+30%
Far Cry New Dawn 61
−31.1%
80−85
+31.1%
Hitman 3 48
−25%
60−65
+25%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
−27.3%
14−16
+27.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
−25%
35−40
+25%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
−23.1%
16−18
+23.1%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
−35%
27−30
+35%
Far Cry 5 54
−29.6%
70−75
+29.6%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−34.6%
70−75
+34.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60
−33.3%
80−85
+33.3%
Metro Exodus 55
−27.3%
70−75
+27.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 60
−33.3%
80−85
+33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
−25%
40−45
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
−28.6%
18−20
+28.6%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 95
−26.3%
120−130
+26.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 32
−25%
40−45
+25%
Hitman 3 34
−32.4%
45−50
+32.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−33
−33.3%
40−45
+33.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
−26.3%
24−27
+26.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
−25%
40−45
+25%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
−23.5%
21−24
+23.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
−20%
6−7
+20%
Battlefield 5 24
−25%
30−33
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−22.7%
27−30
+22.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−25%
45−50
+25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 33
−21.2%
40−45
+21.2%
Metro Exodus 28
−25%
35−40
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8
−25%
10−11
+25%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21
−28.6%
27−30
+28.6%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and RTX A2000 12 GB compete in popular games:

  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 29% faster in 1080p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 32% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A2000 12 GB is 30% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.26 35.48
Recency 29 October 2019 23 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 70 Watt

The RTX A2000 12 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA RTX A2000 12 GB
RTX A2000 12 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4272 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 114 votes

Rate RTX A2000 12 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.