RTX A1000 vs GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER with RTX A1000, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1650 SUPER
2019
4 GB GDDR6, 100 Watt
26.44

RTX A1000 outperforms GTX 1650 SUPER by a small 7% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking211202
Place by popularity57not in top-100
Power efficiency18.2438.89
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2022)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameTU116GA107
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 November 2019 (5 years ago)16 April 2024 (less than a year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802304
Core clock speed1530 MHz727 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz1462 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million8,700 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate138.0105.3
Floating-point processing power4.416 TFLOPS6.737 TFLOPS
ROPs3232
TMUs8072
Tensor Coresno data72
Ray Tracing Coresno data18

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length229 mm163 mm
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed12000 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.2.1311.3
CUDA7.58.6

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.44
RTX A1000 28.18
+6.6%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1650 SUPER 10166
RTX A1000 10835
+6.6%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

GTX 1650 SUPER 55765
+4.9%
RTX A1000 53155

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

GTX 1650 SUPER 53337
+8.3%
RTX A1000 49260

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD70
+0%
70−75
+0%
1440p36
+2.9%
35−40
−2.9%
4K23
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 61
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
−3.2%
65−70
+3.2%
Elden Ring 76
−5.3%
80−85
+5.3%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
Counter-Strike 2 48
−4.2%
50−55
+4.2%
Cyberpunk 2077 47
−6.4%
50−55
+6.4%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+0.8%
120−130
−0.8%
Metro Exodus 89
−1.1%
90−95
+1.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 84
−1.2%
85−90
+1.2%
Valorant 115
−4.3%
120−130
+4.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
Counter-Strike 2 39
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 38
−5.3%
40−45
+5.3%
Dota 2 138
−1.4%
140−150
+1.4%
Elden Ring 82
−3.7%
85−90
+3.7%
Far Cry 5 151
−6%
160−170
+6%
Fortnite 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 101
+1%
100−105
−1%
Grand Theft Auto V 103
+3%
100−105
−3%
Metro Exodus 61
−6.6%
65−70
+6.6%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−4.3%
170−180
+4.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 85−90
−3.4%
90−95
+3.4%
Valorant 100−110
−3.8%
110−120
+3.8%
World of Tanks 260−270
−6.5%
280−290
+6.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 80−85
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
Counter-Strike 2 35
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 32
+6.7%
30−33
−6.7%
Dota 2 191
−4.7%
200−210
+4.7%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−1.3%
80−85
+1.3%
Forza Horizon 4 83
−2.4%
85−90
+2.4%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 160−170
−4.3%
170−180
+4.3%
Valorant 100−110
−3.8%
110−120
+3.8%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 45
+0%
45−50
+0%
Elden Ring 31
+3.3%
30−33
−3.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45−50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
−2.9%
180−190
+2.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
+10%
10−11
−10%
World of Tanks 170−180
−3.4%
180−190
+3.4%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
−3.8%
55−60
+3.8%
Counter-Strike 2 20
−5%
21−24
+5%
Cyberpunk 2077 19
+5.6%
18−20
−5.6%
Far Cry 5 75−80
−2.6%
80−85
+2.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60
+0%
60−65
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55−60
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 35−40
−2.6%
40−45
+2.6%
Valorant 70−75
−4.2%
75−80
+4.2%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 10
+0%
10−11
+0%
Dota 2 45
+0%
45−50
+0%
Elden Ring 17
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45−50
+0%
Metro Exodus 16
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 80−85
−4.9%
85−90
+4.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+3.7%
27−30
−3.7%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 5
+0%
5−6
+0%
Dota 2 80
−6.3%
85−90
+6.3%
Far Cry 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Fortnite 30−35
−6.1%
35−40
+6.1%
Forza Horizon 4 30
+0%
30−33
+0%
Valorant 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and RTX A1000 compete in popular games:

  • A tie in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 3% faster in 1440p
  • RTX A1000 is 4% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.44 28.18
Recency 22 November 2019 16 April 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 50 Watt

RTX A1000 has a 6.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 50% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER and RTX A1000.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is a desktop card while RTX A1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA RTX A1000
RTX A1000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4825 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.7 22 votes

Rate RTX A1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.