TITAN Z vs 1650 SUPER

#ad
Buy
VS
#ad
Buy

Combined performance score

GTX 1650 SUPER
26.17
+12.9%

1650 SUPER outperforms TITAN Z by 13% in our combined benchmark results.

General info

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking189219
Place by popularity50not in top-100
Value for money27.052.50
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameTU116GK110B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date29 October 2019 (4 years old)28 May 2014 (9 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$2,999
Current price$206 $830 (0.3x MSRP)
Value for money

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1650 SUPER has 982% better value for money than GTX TITAN Z.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores12802880
CUDA coresno data5760
Core clock speed1530 MHz705 MHz
Boost clock speed1725 MHz876 MHz
Number of transistors6,600 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rate138.0338 billion/sec
Floating-point performanceno data2x 5,046 gflops

Size and compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI Express 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length229 mm10.5" (26.7 cm)
Heightno data4.376" (11.1 cm)
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinTwo 8-pin

Memory

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed12000 MHz7.0 GB/s
Memory bandwidth192.0 GB/s672 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortOne Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One HDMI, One DisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data4 displays
HDMI++
HDCPno data+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu Ray 3Dno data+
3D Gamingno data+
3D Visionno data+
3D Vision Liveno data+
VR Ready+no data
Multi Monitor+no data

API support

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (11_1)
Shader Model6.55.1
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan1.2.1311.1.126
CUDA7.5+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 SUPER 26.17
+12.9%
GTX TITAN Z 23.19

1650 SUPER outperforms TITAN Z by 13% in our combined benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 SUPER 10143
+12.9%
GTX TITAN Z 8986

1650 SUPER outperforms TITAN Z by 13% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 1650 SUPER 12225
GTX TITAN Z 17130
+40.1%

TITAN Z outperforms 1650 SUPER by 40% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 1650 SUPER 55368
+117%
GTX TITAN Z 25528

1650 SUPER outperforms TITAN Z by 117% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 1650 SUPER 53879
+145%
GTX TITAN Z 22006

1650 SUPER outperforms TITAN Z by 145% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 1650 SUPER 56481
+207%
GTX TITAN Z 18422

1650 SUPER outperforms TITAN Z by 207% in GeekBench 5 CUDA.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD72
+20%
60−65
−20%
1440p36
+20%
30−35
−20%
4K22
+22.2%
18−20
−22.2%

Performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 63
+14.5%
55−60
−14.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 53
+17.8%
45−50
−17.8%
Battlefield 5 72
+20%
60−65
−20%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Cyberpunk 2077 50
+25%
40−45
−25%
Far Cry 5 93
+16.3%
80−85
−16.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 89
+18.7%
75−80
−18.7%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+16%
75−80
−16%
Hitman 3 105
+16.7%
90−95
−16.7%
Horizon Zero Dawn 74
+13.8%
65−70
−13.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 71
+18.3%
60−65
−18.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 85
+13.3%
75−80
−13.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 71
+18.3%
60−65
−18.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Battlefield 5 58
+16%
50−55
−16%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 86
+14.7%
75−80
−14.7%
Far Cry New Dawn 83
+18.6%
70−75
−18.6%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+16%
75−80
−16%
Hitman 3 83
+18.6%
70−75
−18.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn 58
+16%
50−55
−16%
Metro Exodus 51
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30
+25%
24−27
−25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 67
+21.8%
55−60
−21.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90
+20%
75−80
−20%
Watch Dogs: Legion 61
+22%
50−55
−22%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 50−55
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 15
+25%
12−14
−25%
Battlefield 5 57
+14%
50−55
−14%
Cyberpunk 2077 34
+13.3%
30−33
−13.3%
Far Cry 5 79
+12.9%
70−75
−12.9%
Far Cry New Dawn 76
+16.9%
65−70
−16.9%
Forza Horizon 4 85−90
+16%
75−80
−16%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 50
+25%
40−45
−25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40−45
+17.1%
35−40
−17.1%
Hitman 3 51
+13.3%
45−50
−13.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 39
+30%
30−33
−30%
Metro Exodus 29
+20.8%
24−27
−20.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 11
+22.2%
9−10
−22.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 40
+14.3%
35−40
−14.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 27−30
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 13
+30%
10−11
−30%
Battlefield 5 42
+20%
35−40
−20%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+25%
16−18
−25%
Far Cry 5 54
+20%
45−50
−20%
Far Cry New Dawn 55
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+20%
45−50
−20%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Hitman 3 25
+19%
21−24
−19%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Metro Exodus 16
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 32
+18.5%
27−30
−18.5%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18
+21.4%
14−16
−21.4%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5
+25%
4−5
−25%
Battlefield 5 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 3
+50%
2−3
−50%
Far Cry 5 24
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 28
+16.7%
24−27
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion 8
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%

This is how GTX 1650 SUPER and GTX TITAN Z compete in popular games:

1080p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 20% faster than GTX TITAN Z

1440p resolution:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 20% faster than GTX TITAN Z

4K resolution:

  • GTX 1650 SUPER is 22.2% faster than GTX TITAN Z

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 26.17 23.19
Recency 29 October 2019 28 May 2014
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 12 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 375 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX TITAN Z in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

User ratings

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
GeForce GTX TITAN Z

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User ratings: view and submit

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 4064 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 SUPER on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 47 votes

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.