Quadro T1000 vs Radeon RX 5500 XT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

RX 5500 XT
2019
8 GB GDDR6, 130 Watt
23.67
+39.5%

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms Quadro T1000 by a substantial 39% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking215299
Place by popularity67not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation15.388.55
ArchitectureRDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)Turing (2018−2021)
GPU code nameNavi 14 XTXTU117
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date12 December 2019 (4 years ago)27 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$169 no data
Current price$317 (1.9x MSRP)$920

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

RX 5500 XT has 80% better value for money than Quadro T1000.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1408no data
Core clock speed1607 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1845 MHz1455 MHz
Number of transistors6,400 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)130 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate162.4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length180 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed14000 MHz8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth224.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12.0 (12_1)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.0no data
Vulkan1.2.131no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

RX 5500 XT 23.67
+39.5%
Quadro T1000 16.97

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms Quadro T1000 by 39% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

RX 5500 XT 9159
+39.5%
Quadro T1000 6567

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms Quadro T1000 by 39% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

RX 5500 XT 44876
+32.7%
Quadro T1000 33818

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms Quadro T1000 by 33% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

RX 5500 XT 41923
+38.7%
Quadro T1000 30226

Radeon RX 5500 XT outperforms Quadro T1000 by 39% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD75
+50%
50−55
−50%
1440p43
+43.3%
30−35
−43.3%
4K25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 78
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 72
+44%
50−55
−44%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 65−70
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Forza Horizon 4 78
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%
Hitman 3 101
+44.3%
70−75
−44.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 166
+50.9%
110−120
−50.9%
Metro Exodus 132
+46.7%
90−95
−46.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 108
+44%
75−80
−44%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 133
+40%
95−100
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 74
+48%
50−55
−48%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 58
+45%
40−45
−45%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+41.8%
55−60
−41.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Far Cry 5 43
+43.3%
30−33
−43.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 46
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Forza Horizon 4 66
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
Hitman 3 61
+52.5%
40−45
−52.5%
Horizon Zero Dawn 133
+40%
95−100
−40%
Metro Exodus 92
+41.5%
65−70
−41.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2 88
+46.7%
60−65
−46.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 87
+45%
60−65
−45%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 95
+46.2%
65−70
−46.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 64
+42.2%
45−50
−42.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 45−50
+53.3%
30−33
−53.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 49
+40%
35−40
−40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 50−55
+48.6%
35−40
−48.6%
Cyberpunk 2077 40
+48.1%
27−30
−48.1%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+42.5%
40−45
−42.5%
Forza Horizon 4 56
+40%
40−45
−40%
Horizon Zero Dawn 87
+45%
60−65
−45%
Metro Exodus 83
+50.9%
55−60
−50.9%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+45%
40−45
−45%
Watch Dogs: Legion 36
+50%
24−27
−50%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 76
+52%
50−55
−52%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 45−50
+50%
30−33
−50%
Far Cry New Dawn 67
+48.9%
45−50
−48.9%
Hitman 3 45
+50%
30−33
−50%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+50%
16−18
−50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 30−35
+52.4%
21−24
−52.4%
Cyberpunk 2077 20
+42.9%
14−16
−42.9%
Far Cry 5 60
+50%
40−45
−50%
Forza Horizon 4 41
+51.9%
27−30
−51.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+44.4%
45−50
−44.4%
Metro Exodus 60
+50%
40−45
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 66
+46.7%
45−50
−46.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+55.6%
18−20
−55.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry 5 25
+56.3%
16−18
−56.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Hitman 3 26
+44.4%
18−20
−44.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+50%
18−20
−50%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 22
+57.1%
14−16
−57.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 14−16
+50%
10−11
−50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 19
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Battlefield 5 35
+45.8%
24−27
−45.8%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 8
+60%
5−6
−60%
Forza Horizon 4 21
+50%
14−16
−50%
Horizon Zero Dawn 37
+54.2%
24−27
−54.2%
Metro Exodus 31
+47.6%
21−24
−47.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14
+40%
10−11
−40%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24
+50%
16−18
−50%

This is how RX 5500 XT and Quadro T1000 compete in popular games:

  • RX 5500 XT is 50% faster in 1080p
  • RX 5500 XT is 43% faster in 1440p
  • RX 5500 XT is 56% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.67 16.97
Recency 12 December 2019 27 May 2019
Chip lithography 7 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 130 Watt 50 Watt

The Radeon RX 5500 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro T1000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Radeon RX 5500 XT is a desktop card while Quadro T1000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD Radeon RX 5500 XT
Radeon RX 5500 XT
NVIDIA Quadro T1000
Quadro T1000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 2547 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5500 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 302 votes

Rate Quadro T1000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.