Radeon 740M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

GTX 1650 Max-Q
2019
4 GB GDDR5, GDDR6, 35 Watt
15.99
+76.5%

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon 740M by an impressive 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking314451
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation8.35no data
ArchitectureTuring (2018−2021)RDNA 3
GPU code nameN18P-G0 / N18P-G61Phoenix
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date23 April 2019 (5 years ago)23 May 2023 (1 year ago)
Current price$1185 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024256
Core clock speed1020 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speed1245 MHz2500 MHz
Number of transistors4,700 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology12 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt30 Watt (30 - 15 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate72.0040.00

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q and Radeon 740M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5, GDDR6System Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed8000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth112.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan1.2.1401.3
CUDA7.5no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1650 Max-Q 15.99
+76.5%
Radeon 740M 9.06

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon 740M by 76% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1650 Max-Q 6175
+76.4%
Radeon 740M 3501

GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms Radeon 740M by 76% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD61
+103%
30−35
−103%
1440p28
+100%
14−16
−100%
4K19
+90%
10−12
−90%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 49
+158%
18−20
−158%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Battlefield 5 63
+125%
27−30
−125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 42
+133%
18−20
−133%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Far Cry 5 48
+129%
21−24
−129%
Far Cry New Dawn 59
+136%
24−27
−136%
Forza Horizon 4 74
+68.2%
40−45
−68.2%
Hitman 3 30−35
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+64.1%
35−40
−64.1%
Metro Exodus 71
+163%
27−30
−163%
Red Dead Redemption 2 54
+116%
24−27
−116%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+78.6%
27−30
−78.6%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+54.5%
30−35
−54.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 41
+116%
18−20
−116%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Battlefield 5 55
+96.4%
27−30
−96.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 40
+122%
18−20
−122%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Far Cry 5 38
+81%
21−24
−81%
Far Cry New Dawn 41
+64%
24−27
−64%
Forza Horizon 4 179
+307%
40−45
−307%
Hitman 3 30−35
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+64.1%
35−40
−64.1%
Metro Exodus 53
+96.3%
27−30
−96.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45
+80%
24−27
−80%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+78.6%
27−30
−78.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 53
+179%
18−20
−179%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+54.5%
30−35
−54.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20
+5.3%
18−20
−5.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 27−30
+108%
12−14
−108%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 25
+38.9%
18−20
−38.9%
Cyberpunk 2077 24−27
+78.6%
14−16
−78.6%
Far Cry 5 26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
Forza Horizon 4 55
+25%
40−45
−25%
Horizon Zero Dawn 60−65
+64.1%
35−40
−64.1%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 50−55
+78.6%
27−30
−78.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30
+57.9%
18−20
−57.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+54.5%
30−35
−54.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 42
+68%
24−27
−68%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 33
+83.3%
18−20
−83.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 40
+167%
14−16
−167%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 17
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+81.8%
10−12
−81.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 9−10
+125%
4−5
−125%
Far Cry 5 24−27
+85.7%
14−16
−85.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+82.4%
16−18
−82.4%
Hitman 3 18−20
+58.3%
12−14
−58.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 30−35
+68.4%
18−20
−68.4%
Metro Exodus 32
+167%
12−14
−167%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−33
+200%
10−11
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+113%
8−9
−113%
Watch Dogs: Legion 10−11
+100%
5−6
−100%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+73.3%
14−16
−73.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 11
+37.5%
8−9
−37.5%
Far Cry New Dawn 13
+117%
6−7
−117%
Hitman 3 12−14
+140%
5−6
−140%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12
+200%
4−5
−200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18
+200%
6−7
−200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8
+60%
5−6
−60%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+100%
4−5
−100%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 9
+80%
5−6
−80%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+100%
10−12
−100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+88.9%
9−10
−88.9%
Metro Exodus 16
+77.8%
9−10
−77.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
+100%
3−4
−100%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 13
+44.4%
9−10
−44.4%

This is how GTX 1650 Max-Q and Radeon 740M compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 103% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 100% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 90% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1650 Max-Q is 307% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, GTX 1650 Max-Q surpassed Radeon 740M in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.99 9.06
Recency 23 April 2019 23 May 2023
Chip lithography 12 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 30 Watt

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon 740M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
AMD Radeon 740M
Radeon 740M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 581 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 31 vote

Rate Radeon 740M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.