Quadro P5200 Max-Q vs GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile with Quadro P5200 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
2016
2x 8 GB GDDR5
37.42
+14.4%

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile outperforms P5200 Max-Q by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking127169
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.51
ArchitecturePascal (2016−2021)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code namePascal GP104 SLIGP104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date16 August 2016 (8 years ago)21 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores51202560
Core clock speed1556 MHz1316 MHz
Boost clock speed1733 MHz1569 MHz
Number of transistors14400 Million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rateno data251.0
Floating-point processing powerno data8.033 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data160

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataMXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2x 8 GB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed10000 MHz1804 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data230.9 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs
G-SYNC support+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12_112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data1.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD136
+23.6%
110−120
−23.6%
4K96
+20%
80−85
−20%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+21.5%
65−70
−21.5%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+20%
85−90
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+21.5%
65−70
−21.5%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+19.3%
150−160
−19.3%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+20%
80−85
−20%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+21.3%
75−80
−21.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
Valorant 140−150
+14.6%
130−140
−14.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+20%
85−90
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+21.5%
65−70
−21.5%
Dota 2 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+18.8%
80−85
−18.8%
Fortnite 160−170
+18.6%
140−150
−18.6%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+19.3%
150−160
−19.3%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+20%
80−85
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Metro Exodus 90−95
+21.3%
75−80
−21.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 116
+16%
100−105
−16%
Red Dead Redemption 2 70−75
+23.3%
60−65
−23.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 169
+20.7%
140−150
−20.7%
Valorant 140−150
+14.6%
130−140
−14.6%
World of Tanks 270−280
+16.3%
240−250
−16.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 100−110
+20%
85−90
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+18.5%
65−70
−18.5%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+21.5%
65−70
−21.5%
Dota 2 110−120
+18%
100−105
−18%
Far Cry 5 95−100
+18.8%
80−85
−18.8%
Forza Horizon 4 170−180
+19.3%
150−160
−19.3%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+20%
80−85
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 83
+18.6%
70−75
−18.6%
Valorant 140−150
+14.6%
130−140
−14.6%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 30−33
+25%
24−27
−25%
Dota 2 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+15%
60−65
−15%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+16.7%
150−160
−16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
World of Tanks 230−240
+19%
200−210
−19%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 70−75
+16.7%
60−65
−16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+23.3%
30−33
−23.3%
Far Cry 5 120−130
+21%
100−105
−21%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+18.9%
90−95
−18.9%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+24%
50−55
−24%
Metro Exodus 80−85
+17.1%
70−75
−17.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+16.4%
55−60
−16.4%
Valorant 110−120
+15%
100−105
−15%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Dota 2 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+14.8%
27−30
−14.8%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 169
+20.7%
140−150
−20.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
+33.3%
18−20
−33.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 40−45
+22.9%
35−40
−22.9%
Counter-Strike 2 21−24
+27.8%
18−20
−27.8%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+33.3%
12−14
−33.3%
Dota 2 70−75
+20%
60−65
−20%
Far Cry 5 55−60
+22.2%
45−50
−22.2%
Fortnite 50−55
+15.6%
45−50
−15.6%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+22%
50−55
−22%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+16.7%
30−33
−16.7%
Valorant 60−65
+20%
50−55
−20%

This is how GTX 1080 SLI Mobile and P5200 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 24% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is 20% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 37.42 32.70
Recency 16 August 2016 21 February 2018

GTX 1080 SLI Mobile has a 14.4% higher aggregate performance score.

P5200 Max-Q, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year.

The GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro P5200 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile is a notebook graphics card while Quadro P5200 Max-Q is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile
NVIDIA Quadro P5200 Max-Q
Quadro P5200 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.6 3101 vote

Rate GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 14 votes

Rate Quadro P5200 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.