Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile

Place in performance ranking	323	321
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	8.84	3.66
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	Navi / RDNA (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GP107	Navi 14
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	3 January 2017 (7 years ago)	13 November 2019 (4 years ago)
Current price	$545	$2068

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile has 142% better value for money than Pro 5300M.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	1280
CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	1493 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1620 MHz	1250 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	65 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	77.76	100.0

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Radeon Pro 5300M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	7 GB/s	12000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	+	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Ansel

no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	+	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 15.29

Pro 5300M 15.48
+1.2%

Radeon Pro 5300M outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile 5918

Pro 5300M 5988
+1.2%

Radeon Pro 5300M outperforms GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Mobile by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	56 +1.8%	55−60 −1.8%
1440p	25 +4.2%	24−27 −4.2%
4K	17 +6.3%	16−18 −6.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	43 +34.4%	30−35 −34.4%
Battlefield 5	59 +11.3%	50−55 −11.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	47 +17.5%	40−45 −17.5%
Far Cry 5	47 +17.5%	40−45 −17.5%
Far Cry New Dawn	46 +9.5%	40−45 −9.5%
Forza Horizon 4	62 +14.8%	50−55 −14.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2	33 +26.9%	24−27 −26.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	39 +21.9%	30−35 −21.9%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +15.6%	30−35 −15.6%
Battlefield 5	49 −8.2%	50−55 +8.2%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	33 −21.2%	40−45 +21.2%
Far Cry 5	44 +10%	40−45 −10%
Far Cry New Dawn	42 +0%	40−45 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	57 +5.6%	50−55 −5.6%
Metro Exodus	19 −26.3%	24−27 +26.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	24−27 −4%	24−27 +4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	33 +3.1%	30−35 −3.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	47 +46.9%	30−35 −46.9%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	23 −39.1%	30−35 +39.1%
Battlefield 5	42 −26.2%	50−55 +26.2%
Far Cry 5	40 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	38 −10.5%	40−45 +10.5%
Forza Horizon 4	43 −25.6%	50−55 +25.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	26 −23.1%	30−35 +23.1%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21 −9.5%	21−24 +9.5%
Metro Exodus	12 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Red Dead Redemption 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	17 −17.6%	20−22 +17.6%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Battlefield 5	29 −13.8%	30−35 +13.8%
Far Cry 5	26 +4%	24−27 −4%
Far Cry New Dawn	27 −7.4%	27−30 +7.4%
Forza Horizon 4	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4 −175%	10−12 +175%
Metro Exodus	7 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	17 +13.3%	14−16 −13.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	9−10 +0%	9−10 +0%
Battlefield 5	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Far Cry 5	12 +0%	12−14 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	13 −15.4%	14−16 +15.4%
Forza Horizon 4	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%

This is how GTX 1050 Ti Mobile and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 2% faster in 1080p
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 4% faster in 1440p
GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 6% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the High Preset, the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile is 47% faster than the Pro 5300M.
in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Pro 5300M is 175% faster than the GTX 1050 Ti Mobile.

All in all, in popular games: