Radeon Pro 5300M vs GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q

Place in the ranking	434	344
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	9.79	12.62
Architecture	Pascal (2016−2021)	RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code name	GP107	Navi 14
Market segment	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	3 January 2018 (6 years ago)	13 November 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	640	1280
Core clock speed	1190 MHz	1000 MHz
Boost clock speed	1328 MHz	1250 MHz
Number of transistors	3,300 million	6,400 million
Manufacturing process technology	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	85 Watt
Texture fill rate	53.12	100.0
Floating-point processing power	1.7 TFLOPS	3.2 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	32
TMUs	40	80

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	medium sized
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	4 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1752 MHz	1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112.1 GB/s	192.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	2.0
Vulkan	1.2.131	1.2.131
CUDA	6.1	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 10.56

Pro 5300M 15.43
+46.1%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GTX 1050 Max-Q 4073

Pro 5300M 5952
+46.1%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	43 −39.5%	60−65 +39.5%
1440p	24 −45.8%	35−40 +45.8%
4K	14 −28.6%	18−21 +28.6%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18

−50%

24−27
+50%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	37 +5.7%	35−40 −5.7%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −56.3%	24−27 +56.3%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	31 +0%	30−35 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Far Cry 5	37 +2.8%	35−40 −2.8%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −44.8%	40−45 +44.8%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −42.9%	100−105 +42.9%
Hitman 3	20−22 −45%	27−30 +45%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −36.8%	75−80 +36.8%
Metro Exodus	44 −20.5%	50−55 +20.5%
Red Dead Redemption 2	44 +4.8%	40−45 −4.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	63 +26%	50−55 −26%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −21.5%	75−80 +21.5%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 −40%	35−40 +40%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −56.3%	24−27 +56.3%
Battlefield 5	30−35 −51.5%	50−55 +51.5%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	29 −6.9%	30−35 +6.9%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Far Cry 5	30 −20%	35−40 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	27−30 −44.8%	40−45 +44.8%
Forza Horizon 4	97 −3.1%	100−105 +3.1%
Hitman 3	20−22 −45%	27−30 +45%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −36.8%	75−80 +36.8%
Metro Exodus	35 −51.4%	50−55 +51.4%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30 −40%	40−45 +40%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −47.1%	50−55 +47.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 −32.1%	35−40 +32.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −21.5%	75−80 +21.5%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	16 −119%	35−40 +119%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 −56.3%	24−27 +56.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	19 −63.2%	30−35 +63.2%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%
Far Cry 5	22 −63.6%	35−40 +63.6%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 −42.9%	100−105 +42.9%
Hitman 3	20−22 −45%	27−30 +45%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 −36.8%	75−80 +36.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 −47.1%	50−55 +47.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21 −76.2%	35−40 +76.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −21.5%	75−80 +21.5%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−35.5%

40−45
+35.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 −42.9%	30−33 +42.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 −50%	24−27 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10 −50%	14−16 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 −85.7%	12−14 +85.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	11 −54.5%	16−18 +54.5%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −50%	18−20 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	45−50 −68.8%	80−85 +68.8%
Hitman 3	14−16 −28.6%	18−20 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −40.9%	30−35 +40.9%
Metro Exodus	24 −12.5%	27−30 +12.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −86.7%	27−30 +86.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−11 −60%	16−18 +60%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 −41.8%	95−100 +41.8%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−25%

24−27
+25%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −50%	14−16 +50%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Hitman 3	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 −66%	75−80 +66%
Metro Exodus	13 −15.4%	14−16 +15.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 −15.4%	14−16 +15.4%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6 −50%	9−10 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%
Far Cry 5	6 −33.3%	8−9 +33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −61.5%	21−24 +61.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 −87.5%	14−16 +87.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

−40%

14−16
+40%

This is how GTX 1050 Max-Q and Pro 5300M compete in popular games:

Pro 5300M is 40% faster in 1080p
Pro 5300M is 46% faster in 1440p
Pro 5300M is 29% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the GTX 1050 Max-Q is 26% faster.
in Cyberpunk 2077, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Pro 5300M is 200% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

GTX 1050 Max-Q is ahead in 4 tests (6%)
Pro 5300M is ahead in 67 tests (93%)
there's a draw in 1 test (1%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.56	15.43
Recency	3 January 2018	13 November 2019
Chip lithography	14 nm	7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	85 Watt

GTX 1050 Max-Q has 13.3% lower power consumption.

Pro 5300M, on the other hand, has a 46.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon Pro 5300M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce GTX 1050 Max-Q is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Pro 5300M is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.