NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M: specs and benchmarks

VS
Price now 310$
Games supported 62%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
Buy
  • Interface PCIe 3.0 x16
  • Core clock speed 980
  • Max video memory 4 GB
  • Memory type GDDR5
  • Memory clock speed 5400
  • Maximum resolution
Year of release 2013
Performance 5.50

Summary

NVIDIA started GeForce GT 755M sales 25 June 2013. This is Kepler architecture notebook card based on 28 nm manufacturing process and primarily aimed at gamers. 4 GB of GDDR5 memory clocked at 5.4 GHz are supplied, and together with 128 Bit memory interface this creates a bandwidth of 86.4 GB/s.

Compatibility-wise, this is card attached via PCIe 3.0 x16 interface. Power consumption is at 50 Watt.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at

5.50%

of a leader's which is NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3090 Ti.

General info

Of GeForce GT 755M's architecture, market segment and release date.

Place in performance rating563
Value for money0.78
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameN14P-
Market segmentLaptop
Release date25 June 2013 (9 years ago)
Current price$310 of 49999 (A100 SXM4)
Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

  • 0
  • 50
  • 100

Technical specs

GeForce GT 755M's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU base clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of GeForce GT 755M's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384of 18432 (AD102)
Core clock speed980 MHzof 2610 (Radeon RX 6500 XT)
Number of transistors1,270 millionof 14400 (GeForce GTX 1080 SLI Mobile)
Manufacturing process technology28 nmof 4 (GeForce RTX 4080 Ti)
Thermal design power (TDP)50 Wattof 900 (Tesla S2050)
Texture fill rate31.36of 939.8 (H100 SXM5)
Floating-point performance752.6 gflopsof 16384 (Radeon Pro Duo)

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on GeForce GT 755M's compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop sizemedium sized
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16
SLI-ready-

Memory

Parameters of memory installed on GeForce GT 755M: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GBof 128 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Standard memory configurationGDDR5
Memory bus width128 Bitof 8192 (Radeon Instinct MI250X)
Memory clock speed5400 MHzof 21000 (GeForce RTX 3090 Ti)
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/sof 14400 (Radeon R7 M260)
Shared memory-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on GeForce GT 755M. As a rule, this section is relevant only for desktop reference video cards, since for notebook ones the availability of certain video outputs depends on the laptop model.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160
HDMI+
HDCP content protection+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+

Technologies

Technological solutions and APIs supported by GeForce GT 755M. You'll probably need this information if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+
Optimus+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+

API support

APIs supported by GeForce GT 755M, sometimes including their particular versions.

DirectX12 API
Shader Model5.1
OpenGL4.5of 4.6 (GeForce GTX 1080 Mobile)
OpenCL1.1
Vulkan1.1.126
CUDA+

Benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance of GeForce GT 755M. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GT 755M 5.50
  • Passmark
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Vantage Performance
  • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
  • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
  • GeekBench 5 Vulkan
  • Unigine Heaven 3.0
  • Octane Render OctaneBench

Passmark

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

GT 755M 1614

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 755M 2801

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

GT 755M 12711

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 755M 14967

3DMark Fire Strike Score

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 755M 2031

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GT 755M 2106

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GT 755M 2199

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GT 755M 4226

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GT 755M 28

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GT 755M 14

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GT 755M. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) 27 Mh/s  

Game benchmarks

Let's see how good GeForce GT 755M is for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in frames per second. Comparisons with game system requirements are included, but remember that sometimes official requirements may reflect reality inaccurately.

Average FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular modern games across different resolutions:

900p56
Full HD23

Popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
Battlefield 5 5−6
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Far Cry 5 5−6
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
Hitman 3 5−6
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
Battlefield 5 5−6
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Far Cry 5 5−6
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
Hitman 3 5−6
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
Metro Exodus 5−6
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
Battlefield 5 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Far Cry 5 5−6
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
Hitman 3 5−6
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
Metro Exodus 5−6
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
Battlefield 5 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Far Cry 5 5−6
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
Hitman 3 5−6
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
Metro Exodus 5−6
Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
Battlefield 5 5−6
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
Far Cry 5 5−6
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
Watch Dogs: Legion 5−6

Relative perfomance

Overall GeForce GT 755M performance compared to nearest competitors among notebook video cards.


AMD equivalent

The nearest GeForce GT 755M's AMD equivalent is Radeon HD 8870M, which is faster by 1% and higher by 5 positions in our rating.

AMD Radeon HD 8870M Radeon HD 8870M
Compare

Here are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GT 755M:

Similar GPUs

Here is our recommendation of several graphics cards that are more or less close in performance to the one reviewed.

AMD Radeon HD 8870M Radeon HD 8870M
Compare
Intel Iris Graphics 6100 Iris Graphics 6100
Compare
AMD Radeon R7 M380 Radeon R7 M380
Compare
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M GeForce GTX 760M
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 7870M Radeon HD 7870M
Compare
AMD Radeon HD 8770M Radeon HD 8770M
Compare

Recommended processors

These processors are most commonly used with GeForce GT 755M according to our statistics.

User rating

Here you can see the user rating of the graphics card, as well as rate it yourself.


3.3 46 ratings

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about GeForce GT 755M, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.