Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655: specs and benchmarks

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 655

Summary

This is Intel Gen. 9.5 (Kaby Lake) architecture notebook card and primarily aimed at gamers.

It provides poor gaming and benchmark performance at 9.89 percent of a leader's which is AMD Radeon R9 390 X2.

General info

Of Iris Plus Graphics 655's architecture, market type and release date.
Place in performance rating
 
Architecture
Intel Gen. 9.5 (Kaby Lake)
 
Type
Laptop
 
Release date
n/d
 

Technical specs

Iris Plus Graphics 655's general performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core clock, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of Iris Plus Graphics 655's performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider its benchmark and gaming test results.
Pipelines
48
 
of 8192 (Radeon Pro Duo)
Core clock speed
300 MHz
 
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
 

Memory specs

Parameters of memory installed on Iris Plus Graphics 655: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors don't have dedicated memory and use a shared part of system RAM.
Memory type
DDR3/DDR4
 

API support

APIs supported by Iris Plus Graphics 655, sometimes including their particular versions.
DirectX
12 (FL 12_1)
 

Video card benchmarks performance

Non-gaming benchmarks performance of Iris Plus Graphics 655. Note that overall benchmark performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall benchmark performance
9.73
 
 
3DMark Ice Storm GPU
134073.00
 
 
3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
14343.00
 
 
3DMark Fire Strike Score
1898.00
 
 
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
2070.00
 
 
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3044.00
 
 

Relative perfomance

Overall Iris Plus Graphics 655 performance compared to its nearest competitors. All GPU types participate.

Choose a GPU

Compare GPUs

Compare Iris Plus Graphics 655 with others

Other GPUs

Advices and comments

Here you can ask a question about Iris Plus Graphics 655, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.