GeForce GT 755M vs GTX 650 Ti

Place in performance ranking	540	632
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.64	0.89
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code name	GK106	N14P-
Market segment	Desktop	Laptop
Release date	9 October 2012 (11 years ago)	25 June 2013 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$149	no data
Current price	$251 (1.7x MSRP)	$310

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

GT 755M has 39% better value for money than GTX 650 Ti.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	384
CUDA cores	768	no data
Core clock speed	928 MHz	980 MHz
Number of transistors	2,540 million	1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	110 Watt	50 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	105 °C	no data
Texture fill rate	59.2 billion/sec	31.36
Floating-point performance	1,425 gflops	752.6 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on GeForce GTX 650 Ti and GeForce GT 755M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

Laptop size	no data	medium sized
Bus support	PCI Express 3.0	PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	5.7" (14.5 cm)	no data
Height	4.376" (11.1 cm)	no data
Width	2-slot	no data
Supplementary power connectors	One 6-pin	no data
SLI-ready	no data	-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	4 GB
Standard memory configuration	no data	GDDR5
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5.4 GB/s	5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth	86.4 GB/s	86.4 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	One Dual Link DVI-I, One Dual Link DVI-D, One Mini HDMI	No outputs
Multi monitor support	4 Displays	no data
eDP 1.2 signal support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support	no data	Up to 1920x1200
VGA аnalog display support	no data	Up to 2048x1536
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support	no data	Up to 3840x2160
HDMI	+	+
HDCP	+	no data
HDCP content protection	no data	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536	no data
Audio input for HDMI	Internal	no data
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI	no data	+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming	no data	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Blu-Ray	+	no data
Blu-Ray 3D Support	no data	+
3D Gaming	+	no data
3D Vision	+	no data
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder	no data	+
Optimus	no data	+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 API
Shader Model	5.1	5.1
OpenGL	4.3	4.5
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

GTX 650 Ti 6.53
+49.4%

GT 755M 4.37

GTX 650 Ti outperforms GT 755M by 49% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

GTX 650 Ti 2522
+49.4%

GT 755M 1688

GTX 650 Ti outperforms GT 755M by 49% in Passmark.

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

GTX 650 Ti 3430
+62.9%

GT 755M 2106

GTX 650 Ti outperforms GT 755M by 63% in 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics.

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 9%

GTX 650 Ti 7903
+58.9%

GT 755M 4975

GTX 650 Ti outperforms GT 755M by 59% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL.

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Benchmark coverage: 5%

GTX 650 Ti 8194
+93.9%

GT 755M 4226

GTX 650 Ti outperforms GT 755M by 94% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan.

Octane Render OctaneBench

This is a special benchmark measuring graphics card performance in OctaneRender, which is a realistic GPU rendering engine by OTOY Inc., available either as a standalone program, or as a plugin for 3DS Max, Cinema 4D and many other apps. It renders four different static scenes, then compares render times with a reference GPU which is currently GeForce GTX 980. This benchmark has nothing to do with gaming and is aimed at professional 3D graphics artists.

Benchmark coverage: 4%

GTX 650 Ti 23
+64.3%

GT 755M 14

GTX 650 Ti outperforms GT 755M by 64% in Octane Render OctaneBench.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

900p	80−85 +42.9%	56 −42.9%
Full HD	30−35 +42.9%	21 −42.9%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

+25%

8−9
−25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%
Hitman 3	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Battlefield 5	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +33.3%	12−14 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%
Hitman 3	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	16−18 +45.5%	10−12 −45.5%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Cyberpunk 2077	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%
Horizon Zero Dawn	30−33 +30.4%	21−24 −30.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +31.3%	16−18 −31.3%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 +35%	20−22 −35%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

16−18
+45.5%

10−12

−45.5%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 +25%	8−9 −25%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Far Cry 5	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 +42.9%	7−8 −42.9%
Hitman 3	12−14 +33.3%	9−10 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	14−16 +40%	10−11 −40%
Metro Exodus	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

+25%

8−9
−25%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Hitman 3	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	4−5 +33.3%	3−4 −33.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 +25%	4−5 −25%
Metro Exodus	8−9 +33.3%	6−7 −33.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%