FirePro S10000 Passive vs GeForce GT 755M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking735not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.34no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameGK107Tahiti
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date25 June 2013 (12 years ago)12 November 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3843584 ×2
Core clock speed980 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate31.36106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.7526 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs1632 ×2
TMUs32112 ×2
L1 Cache32 KB448 KB
L2 Cache256 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportPCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0PCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data305 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB ×2
Standard memory configurationGDDR5no data
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1350 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s480 GB/s ×2
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
eDP 1.2 signal supportUp to 3840x2160no data
LVDS signal supportUp to 1920x1200no data
VGA аnalog display supportUp to 2048x1536no data
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) supportUp to 3840x2160no data
HDMI+-
HDCP content protection+-
Dual-link DVI support-+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI+-
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming+-

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Blu-Ray 3D Support+-
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder+-
Optimus+-
3D Vision / 3DTV Play+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 API12 (11_1)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.11.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 June 2013 12 November 2012
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 750 Watt

GT 755M has an age advantage of 7 months, and 1400% lower power consumption.

S10000 Passive, on the other hand, has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce GT 755M and FirePro S10000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce GT 755M is a notebook graphics card while FirePro S10000 Passive is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M
GeForce GT 755M
AMD FirePro S10000 Passive
FirePro S10000 Passive

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 97 votes

Rate GeForce GT 755M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce GT 755M or FirePro S10000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.