Radeon 610M vs FirePro V4900

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

FirePro V4900
2011
1 GB GDDR5, 75 Watt
2.56

Radeon 610M outperforms FirePro V4900 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking788753
Place by popularitynot in top-10038
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.41no data
ArchitectureTeraScale 2 (2009−2015)RDNA 2 (2020−2022)
GPU code nameTurksRDNA 2
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 November 2011 (12 years ago)20 September 2022 (1 year ago)
Current price$155 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores480128
Core clock speed800 MHz400 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors716 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology40 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate19.2015.20
Floating-point performance768.0 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on FirePro V4900 and Radeon 610M compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). For notebook video cards it's notebook size, connection slot and bus, if the video card is inserted into a slot instead of being soldered to the notebook motherboard.

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length163 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount1 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed4000 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth64 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.2 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.06.7
OpenGL4.44.6
OpenCL1.22.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FirePro V4900 2.56
Radeon 610M 2.86
+11.7%

Radeon 610M outperforms FirePro V4900 by 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

FirePro V4900 987
Radeon 610M 1104
+11.9%

Radeon 610M outperforms FirePro V4900 by 12% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Hitman 3 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−21.4%
17
+21.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Hitman 3 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Metro Exodus 7−8
−14.3%
8
+14.3%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−16.7%
14
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 9−10
−22.2%
11
+22.2%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
−20%
12−14
+20%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−18.8%
18−20
+18.8%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−25%
10
+25%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−16.7%
7
+16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%
Hitman 3 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 6−7
−16.7%
7−8
+16.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 1−2

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 5−6
−20%
6−7
+20%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 0−1 1−2
Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−100%
2−3
+100%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 0−1 1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 1−2
Far Cry 5 0−1 1−2
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 2−3
−50%
3−4
+50%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−25%
5−6
+25%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−33.3%
4−5
+33.3%

This is how FirePro V4900 and Radeon 610M compete in popular games:

  • Radeon 610M is 17% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.56 2.86
Recency 1 November 2011 20 September 2022
Chip lithography 40 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 15 Watt

The Radeon 610M is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro V4900 in performance tests.

Be aware that FirePro V4900 is a workstation card while Radeon 610M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD FirePro V4900
FirePro V4900
AMD Radeon 610M
Radeon 610M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 132 votes

Rate FirePro V4900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 569 votes

Rate Radeon 610M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.